June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Detection with Vision Transformer: Improved Generalization Across Independent Fundus Photograph Datasets
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christopher Bowd
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Rui Fan
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
    Department of Control Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
  • Kamran Alipour
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Mark Christopher
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Nicole Brye
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • James A. Proudfoot
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Michael Henry Goldbaum
    Jacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Akram Belghith
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Christopher A Girkin
    Department of Ophthalmology, UAB Health System, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Massimo A. Fazio
    Department of Ophthalmology, UAB Health System, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Jeffrey M Liebmann
    Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Robert N Weinreb
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Michael Pazzani
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • David Kriegman
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Linda Zangwill
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Christopher Bowd None; Rui Fan None; Kamran Alipour None; Mark Christopher None; Nicole Brye None; James Proudfoot None; Michael Goldbaum None; Akram Belghith None; Christopher Girkin Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Code F (Financial Support); Massimo Fazio Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Code F (Financial Support); Jeffrey Liebmann Allergan, Genentech, Thea, Bausch & Lomb, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Novartis, Code F (Financial Support); Robert Weinreb Abbvie Inc., Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Allergan, Equinox, Eyenovia, Nicox, Topcon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Konan Medical, Optovue Inc., Centervue, Bausch & Lomb, Topcon Medical Systems Inc., Code F (Financial Support), Toromedes, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code P (Patent); Michael Pazzani None; David Kriegman None; Linda Zangwill Abbvie Inc., Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Optovue Inc., Topcon Medical Systems Inc., Code F (Financial Support), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Eye Institute R01EY029058, R21EY027945, K99EY030942, R01EY011008, R01EY19869, R01EY027510, R01EY026574, Core Grant P30EY022589; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory N00173-P-0751; the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Horncrest Foundation; awards to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at Washington University (NIH grants EY09341, EY09307 and NIH Vision Core Grant P30EY02687); Merck Research Laboratories; Pfizer, Inc.; White House Station (New Jersey); an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. (New York, NY); German Research Foundation research fellowship grant (RE 4155/1-1); and a German Ophthalmological Society Grant.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2295. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher Bowd, Rui Fan, Kamran Alipour, Mark Christopher, Nicole Brye, James A. Proudfoot, Michael Henry Goldbaum, Akram Belghith, Christopher A Girkin, Massimo A. Fazio, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Robert N Weinreb, Michael Pazzani, David Kriegman, Linda Zangwill; Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Detection with Vision Transformer: Improved Generalization Across Independent Fundus Photograph Datasets. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2295.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the accuracy and generalizability of Vision Transformer, a new deep learning (DL) technique, to a traditional convolutional neural network, ResNet-50, for detecting primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) fundus photographs and 5 external datasets.

Methods : 66,715 photographs of 1,636 participants in the OHTS were used to compare the best-performing Vision Transformer model (Data-efficient image Transformer, DeiT) to ResNet-50 for detecting the OHTS Endpoint Committee determinations of POAG attributable to optic disc changes (ENPOAGDISC), visual field changes (ENPOAGVF), or both (ENPOAGANY) and OHTS Optic Disc Reading Center (RCPOAGDISC) and Visual Field Reading Center (RCPOAGVF) determinations. The accuracy of Vision Transformer and Resnet-50 DL models also were compared in 5 external international test datasets of fundus images labeled as glaucoma or healthy: 1) Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES, United States) datasets, 2) the ACRIMA (Spain) dataset, (3) the Large-Scale Attention-based Glaucoma (LAG, China) dataset, (4) the Retinal IMage database for Optic Nerve Evaluation (RIM-ONE, Spain) dataset, (5) The Online Retinal Fundus Image Dataset for Glaucoma Analysis and Research (ORIGA, Singapore) dataset. Areas under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROC) were used to measure model accuracy.

Results : The Vision Transformer models demonstrated similar performance to the ResNet-50 on the OHTS test sets for all 5 ground truth POAG labels (Figure: panel a). The diagnostic accuracy of Vision Transformer was consistently higher than Resnet-50 on the independent external fundus photograph datasets (Figure: panels b-f). For example, the DeiT model AUROC for ENPOAGANY was between 0.08 and 0.20 higher than the ResNet-50 model AUROC.

Conclusions : Vision Transformer has the potential to serve as a critical tool to reduce biases and improve the generalizability of DL models for the detection of glaucoma from fundus photograps.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Comparison of model accuracy (AUROC) between ResNet-50 and DeiT for 5 OHTS ground truth labels (ENPOAGDISC, ENPOAGVF, ENPOAGANY, RCPOAGDISC, and RCPOAGVF) on the OHTS test set and on five external test sets: DIGS/ADAGES, ACRIMA, LAG, RIM-ONE, and ORIGA. Error bars represent 95% CI.

Comparison of model accuracy (AUROC) between ResNet-50 and DeiT for 5 OHTS ground truth labels (ENPOAGDISC, ENPOAGVF, ENPOAGANY, RCPOAGDISC, and RCPOAGVF) on the OHTS test set and on five external test sets: DIGS/ADAGES, ACRIMA, LAG, RIM-ONE, and ORIGA. Error bars represent 95% CI.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×