June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Clinical validation of single-vision lenses optimized by considering user’s accommodation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jose Miguel Cleva
    Clinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Marta Álvarez
    Clinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Amelia González
    Clinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Pablo Concepcion Grande
    Clinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Eva Chamorro
    Clinical Research Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Claudia Irazusta
    Optical Design Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Eduardo Pascual
    Optical Design Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Jose Alonso
    Optical Design Department, Indizen Optical Technologies, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    Applied Optics Complutense Group, Optics Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid Facultad de Optica y Optometria, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jose Miguel Cleva Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment), Indizen Optical Technologies, Code P (Patent); Marta Álvarez Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment); Amelia González Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment); Pablo Concepcion Grande Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment); Eva Chamorro Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment), Indizen Optical Technologies, Code P (Patent); Claudia Irazusta Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment), Indizen Optical Technologies, Code P (Patent); Eduardo Pascual Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment), Indizen Optical Technologies, Code P (Patent); Jose Alonso Indizen Optical Technologies, Code E (Employment), Indizen Optical Technologies, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 3062 – F0534. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jose Miguel Cleva, Marta Álvarez, Amelia González, Pablo Concepcion Grande, Eva Chamorro, Claudia Irazusta, Eduardo Pascual, Jose Alonso; Clinical validation of single-vision lenses optimized by considering user’s accommodation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):3062 – F0534.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The optimization of customized spectacle lenses often considers individual user parameters such as morphological data, frame parameters, and working distances to compensate oblique aberrations. Recently, it has been proposed a new optimization method that considers the accommodative ability of the user to optimize the lens in a more realistic object space and to modulate the oblique aberrations of the user in a more efficient way. The goal of this study is to compare the performance of single vision lenses (SV) optimized with this method against standard spherotorical lenses.

Methods : Double-blind study in which 66 non-presbyopic users were evaluated when wearing a spherotorical SV lens (control) and a customized SV lens optimized with a new method considering user accommodative ability (DRP2). Accommodative lag (LAG) was measured on-axis and 20 degrees off-axis using near retinoscopy at 40cm with a near fixation card attached to the retinoscope. Static visual acuity (VA) was measured on-axis and 20 degrees off-axis at 5.25m. Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) was measured using the software COI-Sport with a speed of 100cm/s at 5.25m. User experience (UX) was evaluated with a satisfaction survey after subjects used both pairs of lenses for 7 days each. Satisfaction rates in scale 1-5 and preferred lens choice were analyzed. Statgraphics Centurion XVI.II software was used to determine differences between lens designs.

Results : Significant higher dynamic VA and UX were found, showing better values for the lens DRP2. Non-significant differences were found in the LAG and static VA between both lenses at any of the viewing positions (Table 1). When the participants were asked to select their preferred lens, 51% preferred the DRP2 lens, 27% selected the control lens and 22% of the participants did not perceive differences between them.

Conclusions : Single-vision lenses optimized with a new optimization method that considers user accommodative ability provide better dynamic visual acuity and user experience than spherotorical lenses. Nevertheless, the accommodation lag of the user remains stable on and off-axis.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×