June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Evaluating multi-planar clear corneal incision architecture with microscope-integrated OCT (MIOCT)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kyung-Min Roh
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Henry Goodell
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • David Li
    Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • James Tian
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Eun Young Choi
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Tso-Ting Lai
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
    Dept of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Joseph A. Izatt
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
    Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Cynthia A Toth
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
    Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Anthony N Kuo
    Dept of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
    Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kyung-Min Roh None; Henry Goodell None; David Li None; James Tian None; Eun Young Choi None; Tso-Ting Lai None; Joseph Izatt Alcon Inc., Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Leica Microsystems Inc., Code P (Patent), Leica Microsystems Inc., Code R (Recipient); Cynthia Toth EMMES, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Theia Imaging, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Theia Imaging, Code O (Owner), Alcon, Code R (Recipient), Theia Imaging, Code R (Recipient); Anthony Kuo Leica Microsystems Inc., Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH U01-EY028079
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2887 – F0024. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kyung-Min Roh, Henry Goodell, David Li, James Tian, Eun Young Choi, Tso-Ting Lai, Joseph A. Izatt, Cynthia A Toth, Anthony N Kuo; Evaluating multi-planar clear corneal incision architecture with microscope-integrated OCT (MIOCT). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2887 – F0024.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Multi-planar clear corneal incisions (CCI) are the standard in cataract surgery for better wound closure and hence decreased risk of endophthalmitis. However, in previous limited experience examining cataract surgery incisions with OCT, we have not observed distinct incision multi-planarity. We sought to test the hypothesis that the manual multi-planar CCI may not actually be multi-planar.

Methods : Under controlled wetlab conditions, 4 ophthalmic surgeons with prior cataract experience (2 attendings, 2 residents) were re-familiarized with the multi-planar CCI and instructed to make 3 CCIs with a standard 2.4 mm keratome in porcine eyes. Each eye’s anterior chamber was filled with viscodispersive prior to the 3 incisions. A research swept source MIOCT (1050 nm, 400 kHz) captured volumes at the CCIs (15 x 15 x 7.2 mm consisting of 750 B-scans x 750 A-scans x 950 depth pixels). For analysis, the anterior surface of each CCI was semi-automatically segmented. Each incision’s center B-scan was refraction corrected and used to calculate the following metrics: incision length, length:width ratio, and internal angles. The internal angles were the angles between the incision’s entry, center, and exit vectors calculated from the first 5%, mid 30%, and last 5% of incision length respectively (Fig. 1E). A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was performed to compare both sets of angles to the theoretical 90° of an ideal multi-planar incision and to 135° for a less acute multi-planar incision.

Results : Table 1 shows the metrics for each surgeon’s CCIs. The null-hypotheses (entry and exit angles are part of distribution around 90°) were rejected in the t-tests (p =4.9x10-4 and 4.9x10-4). The result was the same with the t-test against 135° (p =4.9x10-4 and 4.9x10-4). All incisions had mean length:width ratios >=0.82.

Conclusions : CCIs created with a standard keratome do not appear to have multi-planarity in model porcine corneas. Despite this, length:width ratios show nearly square incisions, and the increased surface area from attempted multi-planar CCIs likely contributes to clinical incision closure.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Table 1: Incision path lengths, length:width ratios, and internal angles with mean/SD for each surgeon (2 attendings, 2 residents)

Table 1: Incision path lengths, length:width ratios, and internal angles with mean/SD for each surgeon (2 attendings, 2 residents)

 

Figure 1: Representative B-scans cropped to the CCI location (attendings: A,B – residents: C,D). The red line is the segmentation of the anterior face of the CCI. E defines the angle metrics.

Figure 1: Representative B-scans cropped to the CCI location (attendings: A,B – residents: C,D). The red line is the segmentation of the anterior face of the CCI. E defines the angle metrics.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×