Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 63, Issue 7
June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Assessing the Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer to Quantify Visual Photosensitivity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rhiya Mittal
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Mariela C. Aguilar
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Alex Gonzalez
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Victoria Graham
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Katherine Leviste
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Paula A. Sepulveda Beltran
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Esdras Arrieta
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Bianca Maceo Heilman
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
  • William J Feuer
    Anne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Gemayaret Alvarez
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Barry Hurwitz
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
    Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
  • Byron L Lam
    Anne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Elizabeth Felix
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    VA Miami Healthcare System, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Jean-Marie Parel
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Anat Galor
    Anne Bates Leach Eye Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    VA Miami Healthcare System, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rhiya Mittal None; Mariela Aguilar None; Alex Gonzalez None; Victoria Graham None; Katherine Leviste None; Paula Sepulveda Beltran None; Esdras Arrieta None; Bianca Maceo Heilman None; William Feuer None; Gemayaret Alvarez None; Barry Hurwitz None; Byron Lam None; Elizabeth Felix None; Jean-Marie Parel None; Anat Galor None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Department of Defense Vision Research Program W81XWH-20-1-0820 (Dr. Galor), Florida Lions Eye Bank and the Beauty of Sight Foundation, Donations from: Drs. Harry W. Flynn Jr, Karl R. Olsen, Martha E. Hildebrandt, Raksha Urs, Aaron Furtado, NIH Center Grant P30EY14801, NIH NEI – LRP (Dr. Aguilar), Research to Prevent Blindness – Unrestricted Grant to BPEI (GR004596), Henri and Flore Lesieur Foundation (Dr. Parel).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4233 – A0161. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rhiya Mittal, Mariela C. Aguilar, Alex Gonzalez, Victoria Graham, Katherine Leviste, Paula A. Sepulveda Beltran, Esdras Arrieta, Bianca Maceo Heilman, William J Feuer, Gemayaret Alvarez, Barry Hurwitz, Byron L Lam, Elizabeth Felix, Jean-Marie Parel, Anat Galor; Assessing the Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer to Quantify Visual Photosensitivity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4233 – A0161.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : As few methods exist to reliably quantify visual photosensitivity, the Ocular Photosensitivity Analyzer (OPA) was devised (Aguilar et al. BOE 2018, 9(11): 5583-5596). This study was conducted to assess the test-retest reproducibility of the OPA to quantify visual photosensitivity thresholds (VPT) in healthy subjects across two visits.

Methods : This IRB-approved study included 25 healthy adults with no history of ocular abnormality. During two in-person visits, subjects were administered study questionnaires (VLSQ-8: Visual Light Sensitivity Questionnaire-8, OSDI: Ocular Surface Disease Index, NPSI-E: Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory for the Eye) and filled out a medical history form. VPT was measured with the OPA, an automated device that assesses subjects’ responses to multiple light stimuli presented at varying intensities. The test-retest reproducibility for VPT measured at each visit was analyzed by reliability analysis. An Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ≥ 0.90 was considered to indicate excellent reliability. Correlation between VPT and study questionnaire responses were assessed via linear regression. An R2 ≥ 0.7 was considered significant.

Results : The average age of the subjects (n=25) was 32.5±13.3 years, 48.0% self-identified as male, 64.0% as White, and 24.0% as Hispanic. Visit #1 and Visit #2 were conducted 34.1±7.1 days apart. The mean measured VPT in healthy subjects were 2.5±0.8 log lux at Visit #1 and 2.3±0.8 log lux at Visit #2. The test-retest reproducibility for healthy subjects measured during the two in-person visits had excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92). Overall, dry eye and ocular pain scores were low in our healthy population (VLSQ-8 11.3±3.5, OSDI 1.2±1.8, NPSI-E 0.8±1.6). No significant correlations were found between VPT and study questionnaire responses (R2=0.03 – 0.06, p>0.05).

Conclusions : The data indicate that the OPA is a reliable tool for quantifying visual photosensitivity in individuals without ocular disease. Ongoing studies are being performed to increase our subject population and examine repeatability in subjects with TBI associated visual photosensitivity.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Figure 1. 1A) Operator view of the OPA. 1B) Subject view of the OPA. 1C) The OPA graphical user interface - testing control panel displaying a healthy subject’s VPT.

Figure 1. 1A) Operator view of the OPA. 1B) Subject view of the OPA. 1C) The OPA graphical user interface - testing control panel displaying a healthy subject’s VPT.

 

Figure 2. VPT of the Healthy Subjects (n=25) at Visit #1 and Visit #2.

Figure 2. VPT of the Healthy Subjects (n=25) at Visit #1 and Visit #2.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×