Dark adapted cyan and red visual fields were obtained from all participants. The reliability factor (% of false positive responses) stayed below the acceptable 20% threshold for all participants, being on average 6.6% ± 4.8 SD (range = 0–17.6%) for cyan and 4.3% ± 3.9 SD (range = 0–18.8%) for the red stimulus. The duration for the cyan test averaged 22.1 minutes ± 1.8 SD (range = 19.4–25.9 minutes) and for the red 23.4 minutes ± 4.7 SD (range = 18.8–37.5 minutes). To assess whether rods or cones mediated detection at each location, we determined the spectral sensitivity difference (SDD; cyan – red) at each point. As previously described,
28 loci were designated as rod-mediated when the SDD was >5 dB. For virtually all test locations (99.7%), the differences calculated as cyan – red were greater than 5 dB, indicating that they were rod-mediated. Thus, only cyan values are plotted in
Figure 6. Three separate areas, peripheral, macular, and peripapillary, were used to evaluate the sensitivity of carrier eyes in relation to normal control eyes. The analysis included both eyes from all CHM carriers in comparison to only one eye from each control because of the observed asymmetrical presentation in carriers. Rod-mediated sensitivity data from healthy control eyes (
Supplementary Table S1) and CHM carriers are shown in
Figure 6 in the form of scatter plots of the median values for each tested eye. For the three areas (macular, peripapillary, and peripheral), with the exception of one outlier in the peripheral area, results from the control eyes are relatively uniform and are within or close to the interquartile (first and third quartile) range. For the CHM carriers, the median values are more spread out reflecting the different state of involvement of retina. In the macular area, the collective median value is similar between the two groups. However, the interquartile range is larger in the carrier group, and three carrier eyes (P1 OD, P4 OS, and P9 OS) have values below the first quartile. The latter all have changes in retinal structure and all three patients reported night vision complaints. For the peripapillary area, the median values and interquartile range are decreased compared with the controls. Three carrier eyes (P1 OU and P3 OS) have markedly decreased median values, values below the first quartile. The difference between the median values of carrier and control eyes is statistically significant (
P < 0.05, Welch's
t-test). This finding is consistent with the observed peripapillary atrophy. For the peripheral area, the median value in the CHM carrier group is slightly higher than the median value of controls. However, the interquartile range is clearly wider in the carrier group, and sensitivity values for 4 eyes (P1 OU, P4 OS, and P9 OS) are below the first quartile. Median and mean values for all CHM carriers for all three areas are presented in the
Table. To evaluate the inter-eye cyan sensitivity differences in each patient, we calculated the corresponding
P values for peripheral and macular areas (we did not perform the calculations for the peripapillary areas because of the small number of test points in this region). For the peripheral area, the differences were statistically significant between the eyes (
P < 0.05) for the following patients: P1, P4, P7, and P9; for the macular area the differences were statistically significant for P1, P4, and P9 (
P < 0.05).