Under transmission electron microscopy, the ultrastructures of SC were clearly identified (
Figs. 3A,
3B). As measured in 12 independent sagittal sections (6 sections from 3 eyes in each group), the lumen was wide open in the COMP–ANG1 group, quantified by the cross-sectional area of SC lumen (control, 470.10 ± 346.13 µm
2 vs COMP-ANG1, 1327.85 ± 530.42 µm
2;
P = 0.016; Mann–Whitney
U test) (
Fig. 3C) and the lumen height (control, 4.04 ± 3.93 µm vs COMP–ANG1, 11.52 ± 3.39 µm;
P = 0.025; Mann–Whitney
U test). Also, the density of GVs in COMP-ANG1 group (0.038 ± 0.012 GV/µm) was higher than that of the control group (0.011 ± 0.014 GV/µm;
P = 0.006; Student
t-test) (
Fig. 3D). In addition, the average Feret's diameter of GVs in COMP-ANG1 group (2.73 ± 1.41 µm;
n = 47) was larger than that of GVs in the control group (1.90 ± 0.44 µm;
n = 13;
P = 0.021; Mann–Whitney
U test) (
Fig. 3E). The average perimeter of the GVs increased from 6.49 ± 1.60 µm in control mice to 10.09 ± 5.49 µm in AAV-DJ.COMP-ANG1–treated eyes (
P = 0.011; Mann–Whitney
U test). Although the mean area of the GVs was also larger in the COMP–ANG1 group (5.79 ± 7.89 µm
2 vs 2.45 ± 1.12 µm
2 in controls), the change was not statistically significant (
P = 0.09; Mann–Whitney
U test). The endothelial monolayer of the SC lies on a discontinuous BM.
33 Interestingly, the activation of ANG–TIE signaling increased the discontinuity of BM manifested by frequent absence of extracellular matrix (ECM) within the layer. The average BM length decreased from 78.5% ± 12.5% of the inner wall length in control mice to 61.2 ± 13.8% in the COMP-ANG1 group (
P = 0.046; Student
t-test) (
Figs. 3F–
3H). In addition, more open spaces were present in the middle JCT in the COMP–ANG1 group (33.4 ± 10.2%) compared with the control group (17.2 ± 4.8%;
P = 0.005; Student
t-test) (
Figs. 3F,
3G,
3I). Although the average porosity in anterior and posterior JCT were both higher in the COMP–ANG1 group (anterior, 25.7 ± 10.6%; posterior, 17.4 ± 8.5%) compared with control mice (anterior, 17.9 ± 8.0%; posterior, 14.2 ± 4.8%), the differences did not reach the statistical threshold (
P = 0.182 and 0.200, respectively). To further analyze the functional implications of endothelia and ECM modification, fluorescent tracers were perfused under constant inflow into mouse eyes in vivo. Consistent with an enlarged SC area, the microbeads deposition area (namely, the effective filtration area) was increased in the COMP–ANG1 group (3.68 ± 1.30 mm
2;
n = 8 eyes) compared with control mice (2.36 ± 1.13 mm
2;
n = 9 eyes;
P = 0.041; Student
t-test) (
Figs. 4A,
4B). However, the mean MFI of effective filtration area (
P = 0.712; Student
t-test) (
Fig. 4C) and the proportions of high flow, intermediate flow, and low flow areas (all
P > 0.05; Student
t-test) (
Fig. 4D) did not change significantly after AAV injection.