Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 64, Issue 8
June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
S-cone isolating acuity in subjects with spectrally classified cone mosaics
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Emily Slezak
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Palash Bharadwaj
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Daniel R. Coates
    College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Ramkumar Sabesan
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Emily Slezak None; Palash Bharadwaj None; Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan PCT/US2020/029984, Code P (Patent); Daniel Coates None; Ramkumar Sabesan PCT/US2020/029984, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH grants U01EY032055, EY029710, P30EY001730, Burroughs Wellcome Fund Careers at the Scientific Interfaces, DOD Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-21-1-0230, Unrestricted grant from the Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 469. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emily Slezak, Palash Bharadwaj, Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan, Daniel R. Coates, Ramkumar Sabesan; S-cone isolating acuity in subjects with spectrally classified cone mosaics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):469.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : S-cone isolating visual acuity (sVA) is constrained by the S-cone sub-mosaic. Previous studies relating them have compared acuity from human subjects against the S-cone topography measured in histology, leading to mixed conclusions, potentially due to individual differences in S-cone density. The present study examined sVA in subjects with spectrally classified cone mosaics to test how the grain of the S-cone sub-mosaic limits resolution.

Methods : Four cyclopleged subjects participated in an sVA task. Two of these subjects had their cones classified via adaptive optics (AO)-OCT based optoretinography at 1.5°, 4°, and 10° nasal eccentricity. The sVA task was performed at the same locations. Subjects adapted to light that appeared yellow (CIE (x,y) : 0.451, 0.516; 200 cd/m2) for two minutes. sVA was then measured using a Tumbling ‘E’ task that showed blue (CIE (x,y) : 0.16, 0.044; 0.66 cd/m2) letters on the same yellow background, with an S-cone contrast of 0.93 (L/M-cone contrasts <0.01). The stimuli appeared on a DMD projector coupled into an AOSLO. High-resolution AOSLO videos were recorded simultaneously with stimulus presentation, to help guide stimulus delivery to the spectrally classified retinal area.

Results : In agreement with literature, the measured mean foveal sVA was 20/156±33. sVA worsened with increasing eccentricity, though at a faster rate than observed previously. In aggregate, sVA at 1.5°, 4°, and 10° was 20/156±28, 20/232±32, and 20/463±115 respectively. For the two subjects with classified mosaics, sVA at all eccentricities was worse than predicted by the Nyquist limit, as defined by their measured S-cone spacing. The mean Nyquist limit, converted to Snellen acuity, for 1.5°, 4°, and 10° was 20/87±7, 20/135±25 and 20/143±24 respectively. Despite variations in their S-cone density and sVA, the ratio of measured sVA and the Nyquist limit was remarkably consistent between the two subjects at the different eccentricities; 1.6±0.12, 1.7±0.09 and 2.6±0.003 for 1.5°, 4°, and 10° respectively.

Conclusions : S-cone isolating letter acuity follows a coarser grain than that defined by the Nyquist sampling of the S-cones. Instead, acuity is in good concordance with the Nyquist limit imposed by the small bistratified retinal ganglion cells. The striking consistency of the sampling factor between subjects suggests a unified pooling mechanism, based on inputs from multiple S-cones.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×