June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Different contrast response functions for sawtooth stimulation favoring ON vs OFF visual pathways in the upper and lower visual fields.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Martin Timothy Wilkinson Scott
    Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Alexandra Yakovleva
    Opthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Anthony Matthew Norcia
    Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Martin Scott None; Alexandra Yakovleva None; Anthony Norcia None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Eye Institute (P30-EY026877 and R01-EY030361-01) and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 30. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Martin Timothy Wilkinson Scott, Alexandra Yakovleva, Anthony Matthew Norcia; Different contrast response functions for sawtooth stimulation favoring ON vs OFF visual pathways in the upper and lower visual fields.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):30.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : ON- and OFF-pathways may be differently affected by vision-loss in glaucoma. Therefore, a measure that can describe ON and OFF pathway functional integrity is desirable. Here we develop a Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) method that simultaneously measures ON and OFF pathway responses from the upper and lower visual fields.

Methods : We measured ON and OFF biased responses in the upper and lower visual fields across a range of luminance contrasts in 17 observers with normal vision using a 128 channel EEG system. Upper and lower visual field luminance-modulated probes were flickered at 3.0 and 3.75 Hz with a sawtooth profile, the polarity of which was set to bias responses towards the ON or OFF pathways. Spectral analysis separates these simultaneously recorded responses. To analyze these data, each observer’s 128 channel dataset was algorithmically reduced to a small number of stimulus-tracking components, separately for the upper and lower fields. Signal amplitudes were fit with a transducer function at the group-level, the parameters of which describe the sensitivity of the underlying neuronal populations. Parameters for the ON and OFF pathways in the Upper and Lower visual field were compared via bootstrapping.

Results : The contrast response functions of the ON and OFF pathways were reliably measured in the upper and lower visual fields, although they differed in form. OFF-favoring stimuli generated larger responses overall. Response functions in the upper visual field were shallower and continued to increase over a wider range of contrast levels. This difference, described by the semi-saturation parameter of the fits, was significant (p < .05) when comparing the ON pathway in the upper visual field to the OFF pathway in the lower visual field (m.d. = 62%, 95CI = 1.4 – 106%), and the OFF upper pathway to the OFF lower pathway (m.d. = 21%, 95CI = 4.3 – 73%). Qualitatively, ON and OFF responses in the lower visual field were more alike at high contrasts, where responses in the upper visual field were readily discriminable.

Conclusions : Our two-frequency sawtooth SSVEP protocol simultaneously measures ON and OFF pathway responses in the upper and lower visual field. Probes of intermediate contrast, where pathway responses functions are most different, may be better suited to assess pathway integrity.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×