June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Repeatability of photopic negative response parameters in normal subjects using Diopsys®NOVA™
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Isabel Sendino
    Ophthalmology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon, Leon, Castilla y Leon, Spain
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Amir Akhavanrezayar
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Negin Yavari
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Andrea Perez-Alvarez
    Ophthalmology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon, Leon, Castilla y Leon, Spain
  • Irmak Karaca
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • SungWho Park
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Hassan khojasteh
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Hashem Ghoraba
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Chi Mong Christopher Or
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Albert Bromeo
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Cigdem Yasar
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Ngoc Than
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Vahid Bajozoo
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Gunay Uludag
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Diana V Do
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Quan Dong Nguyen
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Isabel Sendino None; Amir Akhavanrezayar None; Negin Yavari None; Andrea Perez-Alvarez None; Irmak Karaca None; SungWho Park None; Hassan khojasteh None; Hashem Ghoraba None; Chi Mong Christopher Or None; Albert Bromeo None; Cigdem Yasar None; Ngoc Than None; Vahid Bajozoo None; Gunay Uludag None; Diana Do Belite Bio, Genentech, Kriya, Regeneron, Rezolute, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Quan Nguyen Allergan, Genentech, Kriya, Regeneron, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Kodiak, Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 264. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Isabel Sendino, Amir Akhavanrezayar, Negin Yavari, Andrea Perez-Alvarez, Irmak Karaca, SungWho Park, Hassan khojasteh, Hashem Ghoraba, Chi Mong Christopher Or, Albert Bromeo, Cigdem Yasar, Ngoc Than, Vahid Bajozoo, Gunay Uludag, Diana V Do, Quan Dong Nguyen; Repeatability of photopic negative response parameters in normal subjects using Diopsys®NOVA™. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):264.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Photopic negative response (PhNR) has been utilized to evaluate the optic nerve and ganglion cell layer function. However, the general application is limited due to the complexity and long duration of the standard protocol using traditional electroretinography devices. Diopsys®NOVA™ is a new user-friendly electroretinography device which is capable of measuring PhNR parameters more rapidly. In this prospective case series, we evaluated the repeatability of PhNR measurements in normal subjects (no known ocular disease).

Methods : A total of 36 eyes of 18 healthy subjects were included in the study. PhNR and its related parameters, including MVAIndex (an AI-assisted index devised by the device company to predict the abnormality of PhNR), latency (for PhNR, A-wave, and B-wave), and amplitude (for PhNR, A-wave, and B-wave) were measured using Diopsys®NOVA™. The measurements were performed 3 consecutive times, with 10-minute intervals, during the same session by a single examiner. The statistical test of repeatability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)], was calculated using R (version 4.1.3).

Results : The mean age of the subjects was 30.94 ± 4.59 years old. MVAIndex and PhNR latency showed good-to-excellent repeatability [0.614-0.853 (p < 0.0001)], [0.397-0.741 (p < 0.0001)], respectively; however, PhNR amplitude values demonstrated poor repeatability [-0.065-0.353 (p = 0.105)]. Using the ICC, A and B waves latencies had excellent repeatabilities [0.624-0.858 (p < 0.0001); 0.798-0.930 (p < 0.0001)]. A-wave and B-wave amplitude had good-to-excellent [0.413-0.748 (p < 0.0001)] and excellent [0.677-0.883 (p < 0.0001)] repeatability, respectively.

Conclusions : The majority of PhNR and its related parameters measurements using Diopsys®NOVA™ in subjects with no known ocular disease showed a good-to-excellent level of repeatability. Based on this finding, Diopsys®NOVA™ may be considered as an alternative and rapid method for measuring the PhNR parameters.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×