June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Single-Cell Analysis Explains Differences Between Lacrimal and Submandibular Gland Structure and Function
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Helen P Makarenkova
    Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Olivier Mauduit
    Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Vanessa DELCROIX
    Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Helen Makarenkova None; Olivier Mauduit None; Vanessa DELCROIX None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH NEI, grant EY026202; NIH NIDCR grant DE031044
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 170. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Helen P Makarenkova, Olivier Mauduit, Vanessa DELCROIX; Single-Cell Analysis Explains Differences Between Lacrimal and Submandibular Gland Structure and Function. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):170.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Both lacrimal (LG) and submandibular (SMG) glands secrete fluids that protect mucosal membranes, but saliva is related to digestion, while the LG provides multiple components to the tear film that sustains the ocular surface. Both glands are also affected by aging and Sjögren’s syndrome although they respond differently to stress, injury, and disease. We compared cell types between LG and SMG at single-cell resolution for better understanding the specific features and function of these two glands.

Methods : For LG dataset, we performed scRNA sequencing of 2 months old (2M) C57BL/6J mice (males and females). For SMG dataset we used publicly available data from GSE175649 and GSE150327. All data were analyzed with SEURAT v4 using R Studio (v1.4) software.

Results : Principal component analysis (PCA) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) identified 12 main cell clusters that were further sub-clustered to determine specific cell types/populations. As expected within ductal compartments we identified three SMG-unique ductal clusters that were not present in the LG: granular ducts (GCT) containing recently identified ionocytes (expressing Foxi1, Ascl3 and Fgf10) and two striated cell ductal clusters: Klk1+/Egf+ also containing ionocytes, and Klk1+/Egf- cluster. Cftr (that we previously showed as mainly expressed by ionocytes) was found in the GCT cluster and the Egf+ striated duct cluster. Both glands have basal ductal cell clusters with slightly different gene expression and Kit+ intercalated ducts . Both glands also shared two acinar clusters: one enriched in secretoglobins and another Pigr+/Kcnn4+ that was also enriched in Aqp5 and Bhlha15, while LG also had two more unique acinar clusters. One other striking difference was that in the SMG Car6 was expressed at higher level in a large population of mature acinar cells, while in the LG the Car6high cells also formed a small cluster of putative committed acinar progenitors. In addition, only LG had a cluster of Fgf10+ fibroblasts.

Conclusions : Our data outlines common and unique features in LG and SMG functions that may explain differences in ECM deposition and organization between the two glands.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×