June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Clustering and Treatment Patterns in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: A United States Claims Database Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Murtaza K Adam
    Colorado Retina Associates, Denver, Colorado, United States
  • Mishank Jain
    The Western Eye Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICHNT), London, United Kingdom
  • Eunice Kim
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Bonny Shah
    Genesis Research LLC, Hoboken, New Jersey, United States
  • Aaron Crowley
    Genesis Research LLC, Hoboken, New Jersey, United States
  • Joowon Lee
    Genesis Research LLC, Hoboken, New Jersey, United States
  • Gloria C Chi
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Murtaza Adam Genentech, Inc., Allergan, Dutch Ophthalmic, Regnxbio, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Genentech, Inc., Regeneron, Code S (non-remunerative); Mishank Jain Roche, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Roche, Code E (Employment); Eunice Kim Genentech Inc., Code E (Employment); Bonny Shah Genesis Research, Code E (Employment); Aaron Crowley Genesis Research, Code E (Employment); Joowon Lee Genesis Research, Code E (Employment); Gloria Chi Genentech Inc., Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, provided support for the study and participated in the study design; conducting the study; and data collection, management, and interpretation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 1744. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Murtaza K Adam, Mishank Jain, Eunice Kim, Bonny Shah, Aaron Crowley, Joowon Lee, Gloria C Chi; Clustering and Treatment Patterns in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: A United States Claims Database Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):1744.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The rising prevalence of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) is expected to burden patients and health care in the United States. Patients with nAMD or DME in the real world receive fewer injections and experience poorer visual outcomes than patients in clinical trials. This analysis clustered patients treated similarly for nAMD and DME and described their characteristics.

Methods : An observational study was conducted using MarketScan claims databases of patients with incident unilateral nAMD or DME treated with ≥1 anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection from January 1, 2017– July 1, 2018 and followed for 2 years. To group patients with similar treatment patterns, machine learning algorithms clustered patients by treatment characteristics including the number and time between anti-VEGF injections and monitoring visits; corticosteroid usage was included for DME only. For each identified cluster, demographics and baseline patient characteristics such as insurance type were described.

Results : Three clusters were identified each for nAMD and DME. For nAMD, over 2 years, Clusters 1 (n=1140), 2 (n=604), and 3 (n=294) had mean anti-VEGF injection frequencies of 11.2, 8.8, and 2.1, respectively, and gaps of ≥6 months in treatment/monitoring in 33%, 68%, and 93% of patients, respectively. Cluster 1 had 84% Medicare patients, Cluster 2 had 62% Medicaid patients, and Cluster 3 had 45% Medicare/46% Medicaid patients (p<0.001). Clusters 1, 2, and 3 had 67%, 5%, and 33% Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) insurance, respectively (p<0.001).

For DME, over 2 years, Clusters 1 (n=79), 2 (n=101), and 3 (n=217) had mean anti-VEGF injection frequencies of 7.5, 6.3, and 2.1, respectively, and gaps of ≥12 months in treatment/monitoring in 5%, 11%, and 12% of patients, respectively. Cluster 1 had 70% commercial patients, Cluster 2 had 88% Medicaid patients, and Cluster 3 had 62% Medicaid patients (p<0.001). Clusters 1, 2, and 3 had 63%, 7%, and 21% PPO insurance, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions : Cluster analysis identified three groups within each disease that were separated by treatment characteristics. Payer and insurance type differed by cluster and may be associated with treatment patterns. The impact of these differences in vision and anatomic outcomes remains to be assessed.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×