June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Beyond Vision: The Selection of Preferred Retinal Loci is Affected by Hearing Status
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • YINGZI XIONG
    University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
    Envision Research Institute, Kansas, United States
  • Peggy Nelson
    University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Donald Fletcher
    Envision Research Institute, Kansas, United States
  • Gordon E Legge
    University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   YINGZI XIONG None; Peggy Nelson None; Donald Fletcher None; Gordon Legge None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant 1K99EY030145
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 2436. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      YINGZI XIONG, Peggy Nelson, Donald Fletcher, Gordon E Legge; Beyond Vision: The Selection of Preferred Retinal Loci is Affected by Hearing Status. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):2436.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Individuals with central field loss often establish preferred retinal loci (PRLs) to substitute for their dysfunctional foveal vision. However, visual factors such as acuity, and contrast sensitivity often fail to explain why specific PRLs were selected. Here we explore the hypothesis that a nonvisual factor, hearing status, biases the choice of PRL location.

Methods : Forty-five subjects with central field deficits participated in this study with a primary diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration. The binocular PRL was measured by the California Central Visual Field Test, and the site was defined in visual field coordinates in relation to the scotoma. A lateral PRL indicates that the PRL is to the left or right of the scotoma, and a vertical PRL indicates that the PRL is superior or inferior to the scotoma. Pure-tone hearing thresholds were measured by an air conduction audiometer. Bilateral threshold was defined as the better ear average across 0.5-4kHz, and bilateral asymmetry was defined as the difference between the monaural thresholds.

Results : Acuities ranged from -0.1 to 1.49 logMAR, bilateral threshold ranged from 0 to 56 dB Hearing Level, and the bilateral asymmetry ranged from 0 to 35 dB Hearing Level. Twenty-five of the subjects showed eccentric viewing with established PRLs. Ten subjects adopted a PRL only lateral to the scotoma, nine subjects used a PRL only vertical to the scotoma, and six subjects used a PRL both lateral and vertical to the scotoma (e.g., left-superior PRL). Logistic regression showed that subjects were significantly more likely to choose a PRL that is to their better ear side (p = 0.033). Moreover, as bilateral hearing threshold increases, the odds of adopting vertical PRLs decreases (p = 0.031). Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were not significant predictors for the adoption of lateral or vertical PRLs.

Conclusions : Our preliminary results support the possibility that hearing status biases the selection of PRLs, which increasingly favors selection of a lateral PRLs on the better hearing side. This strategy is ecologically plausible considering the importance of aligning visual and auditory references of straight ahead in both mobility and social interactions.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×