Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 64, Issue 8
June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Hemoglobin A1c Methods and Reporting in Diabetic Eye and Major Diabetes Trials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Laura Le
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Tracey Wang
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Margaret Chang
    Retinal Consultants, Sacramento, California, California, United States
  • Michael C Chang
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Monica Wetzel-Smith
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Paul Latkany
    Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Laura Le Genentech, Code E (Employment); Tracey Wang Genentech, Code E (Employment); Margaret Chang Genentech, Regenxbio, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Michael Chang Genentech, Code E (Employment); Monica Wetzel-Smith Genentech, Code E (Employment); Paul Latkany Genentech, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 2271. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Laura Le, Tracey Wang, Margaret Chang, Michael C Chang, Monica Wetzel-Smith, Paul Latkany; Hemoglobin A1c Methods and Reporting in Diabetic Eye and Major Diabetes Trials. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):2271.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Hyperglycemia is a risk factor for the development and progression of diabetic macular edema/retinopathy (DME/DR). Glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1c) reflects average blood glucose level over 8–12 weeks, and is the most clinically used biomarker for monitoring glycemic control in diabetics. We investigated methods by which DR/DME and major diabetes clinical trials monitored and reported A1c.

Methods : We identified landmark diabetes and DR/DME clinical trials with minimum duration of 1 year from references cited from the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s Diabetic Retinopathy Preferred Practice Pattern, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Study design and reporting features were evaluated.

Results : We identified 47 diabetic eye trials (23 DR/24 DME) and 10 landmark diabetes glucose control trials. The % of DR/DME and diabetes trials with A1c enrollment criteria was 53% (25/47) and 30% (3/10), respectively. Of DR/DME trials beginning years <2000, 2000-2010 and >2010, the percentage with A1c enrollment criteria was 0% (0/4), 57% (8/14), and 59% (17/29), respectively. Of the DR/DME and diabetes trials that collected A1c, the % that reported A1c assay methods was 21% (7/34) and 89% (8/9), respectively. The % of DR/DME and diabetes trials that collected A1c at baseline and endpoint was 45% (19/42) and 80% (8/10), respectively. Of studies with >1 year duration, the % of DR/DME and diabetes trials that collected A1c at least 1/year was 55% (11/20) and 67% (6/9), respectively. Of the DR/DME trials with >1 year duration, those that began years <2000, 2000-2010 and >2010 and sampled A1c at least once a year was 33% (1/3), 33% (4/12), and 67% (6/9) of trials, respectively. Of DR/DME and diabetes trials that statistically evaluated the relationship between baseline A1c and treatment effect/disease progression, 67% (8/12) and 100% (5/5) of trials found significant associations, respectively.

Conclusions : The reporting, methods and enrollment criteria related to A1c varies across diabetes trials and over time. There was a trend of more frequent A1c monitoring across all diabetic eye trials over time. However, diabetes eye trials had less frequent A1c evaluation compared to major diabetes trials, despite more frequent disease progression assessments in eye trials. Further work should be considered to evaluate the optimal methodology of hyperglycemia monitoring in diabetes clinical trials.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×