June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Comparison of scleral suture fixated versus scleral flanged haptic technique
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Angela Gauthier
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Abdelhalim Awidi
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • David Zhao
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Yassine Daoud
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Angela Gauthier None; Abdelhalim Awidi None; David Zhao None; Yassine Daoud None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 2894. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Angela Gauthier, Abdelhalim Awidi, David Zhao, Yassine Daoud; Comparison of scleral suture fixated versus scleral flanged haptic technique. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):2894.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Different techniques of scleral fixation can be used to manage dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the absence of capsular support. This study aimed to determine the surgical efficacy and clinical outcomes of conventional sutured scleral IOL fixation versus flanged sutureless intrascleral fixation technique.

Methods : A retrospective observational study of 144 eyes that underwent conventional sutured scleral fixation and 40 eyes that underwent flanged sutureless intrascleral fixation was performed over a six-year study period. The primary outcomes were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), assessed at the preoperative and postoperative month 3 (POM3) visits. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications including reoperation due to IOL instability.

Results : Mean UCVA change from preoperative to POM3 visits was -0.83 ± 1.05 logMAR (p = 0.112) in the conventional group vs. -0.55 ± 0.64 logMAR in the flanged sutureless group (p<0.001). Improvement in BCVA was also seen from preoperative to POM3 visits and had a mean change of -0.13 ± 0.25 logMAR (p = 0.272) in the conventional group vs. -0.18 ± 0.37 logMAR in the flanged sutureless group (p<0.001). Refixation was performed in 3 eyes (7.5%) in the conventional group compared to 2 eyes (1.4%) in the flanged sutureless group. 2 eyes developed an epiretinal membranein both groups, while hyphema developed in 2 eyes (1.4%) in the conventional group vs. 1 eye in the sutureless group (2.5%).

Conclusions : Both conventional sutured scleral fixation and flanged sutureless intrascleral fixation techniques showed improvements in visual acuity postoperatively, with a similar postoperative complication profile. Further large-scale studies assessing the safety and efficacy of both techniques are warranted.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×