June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Differences in Outflow Facility between Angiographically Identified High- versus Low-flow Regions of the Conventional Outflow Pathways in Porcine Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xiaowei Zhang
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Daniel Wanderer
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Daniel W Stamer
    Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Fiona McDonnell
    Department of Ophthalmology,, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Robert Weinreb
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Clemens Strohmaier
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Alex S Huang
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Xiaowei Zhang None; Daniel Wanderer None; Daniel Stamer None; Fiona McDonnell None; Robert Weinreb Abbvie, Allergan, Amydis, Equinox, Eyenovia, Nicox, Topcon, , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Heidelberg Engineering, Zeiss, Optovue, Centervue, Topcon , Code F (Financial Support); Clemens Strohmaier Santen, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Santen, Code F (Financial Support), Zeiss, AbbVie, Code R (Recipient); Alex Huang Abbvie, Celanese, Equinox, Glaukos, QLARIS, Santen, Topcon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Amydis, Glaukos, Heidelberg Engineering , Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant R01EY030501 [ASH], NIH Grant R01EY029058 [RNW]; T32EY026590 (DW), P30EY022589 (Core grant UCSD), an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY) [UCSD]; the Advanced Clinician Scientist Program/Johannes Kepler University (CAS) and the Adele Rabensteiner Foundation (CAS).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 3482. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiaowei Zhang, Daniel Wanderer, Daniel W Stamer, Fiona McDonnell, Robert Weinreb, Clemens Strohmaier, Alex S Huang; Differences in Outflow Facility between Angiographically Identified High- versus Low-flow Regions of the Conventional Outflow Pathways in Porcine Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):3482.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate differences in outflow facility between angiographically determined high- and low-flow segments of the conventional outflow pathway in porcine eyes.

Methods : Porcine anterior segments (n = 14) were mounted in a perfusion chamber and perfused using Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered solution with glucose. Fluorescein angiography was performed to determine high- and low-flow regions of the conventional outflow pathways. The trabecular meshwork (TM) was occluded using cyanoacrylate glue, except for residual 5 mm TM areas that were either high- or low-flow at baseline. This step designated these eyes as "residual high-flow” or “residual low-flow” eyes. Subsequently, outflow was quantitatively re-assessed and compared between “residual high-flow” and “residual low-flow” eyes followed by indocyanine green angiography.

Results : Fluorescein aqueous angiography demonstrated high-flow and low-flow regions. Before TM occlusion, baseline outflow facilities were 0.320 ± 0.08 and 0.328 ± 0.10 ml/min/mmHg (p=0.676) in eventual “residual high-flow” and “residual low-flow,” respectively. After partial trabecular meshwork occlusion, outflow facility decreased to 0.209 ± 0.07 µl/min/mmHg (- 32.66 ± 19.53 %) and 0.114 ± 0.08 µl/min/mmHg (- 66.57 ± 23.08 %) in residual high- and low-flow eyes (p=0.035), respectively. There was a significant difference in the resulting IOP increase (31.03 ± 8.51 mm Hg [residual low-flow] vs. 21.30 ± 6.57 mm Hg [residual high-flow]; p=0.034). Various aqueous humor outflow patterns were seen after occlusion using indocyanine green angiography.

Conclusions : Angiographically determined high- and low-flow regions in the conventional outflow pathways differ in their segmental outflow facility. Thus, there is an uneven distribution of local outflow facility across different parts of the TM. Future investigation into these regions across different parts of the TM could offer potential therapeutic targets regarding IOP regulation and lowering.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×