June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter phase 3 trials of the travoprost intraocular implant versus topical timolol
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L. Jay Katz
    Medical Affairs, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Steven R. Sarkisian
    Oklahoma Eye Surgeons, PLLC, Oklahoma, United States
  • Lilit A. Voskanyan
    Ophtalmological Center after S.V. Malayan, Armenia
  • Robert T. Ang
    Asian Eye Institute, Makati City, Philippines
  • Mark J. Gallardo
    El Paso Eye Surgeons, Texas, United States
  • John P. Berdahl
    Vance Thompson Vision, South Dakota, United States
  • Sebastian B. Heersink
    Eye Center South dba Trinity Research Group, Alabama, United States
  • George R. Reiss
    Eye Physicians and Surgeons of Arizona, Arizona, United States
  • Long V Doan
    Clinical Research, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Kerry G. Stephens
    Clinical Research, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Robert J. Sanchez
    Research and Development, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • David Applegate
    Commercial Development, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Dale Usner
    Biostatistics and Data Management, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Kenneth M. Curry
    Research and Development, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Dave S. Haffner
    Research and Development, Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Tomas Navratil
    Glaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   L. Jay Katz Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment), Glaukos Corporation, Code S (non-remunerative); Steven Sarkisian Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Lilit Voskanyan Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Robert Ang Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Mark Gallardo Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); John Berdahl Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Sebastian Heersink Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); George Reiss Glaukos Corporation, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Long Doan Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); Kerry Stephens Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); Robert Sanchez Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); David Applegate Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); Dale Usner Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); Kenneth Curry Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); Dave Haffner Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment); Tomas Navratil Glaukos Corporation, Code E (Employment), Glaukos Corporation, Code S (non-remunerative)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4296. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L. Jay Katz, Steven R. Sarkisian, Lilit A. Voskanyan, Robert T. Ang, Mark J. Gallardo, John P. Berdahl, Sebastian B. Heersink, George R. Reiss, Long V Doan, Kerry G. Stephens, Robert J. Sanchez, David Applegate, Dale Usner, Kenneth M. Curry, Dave S. Haffner, Tomas Navratil; Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter phase 3 trials of the travoprost intraocular implant versus topical timolol. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4296.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Two parallel Phase 3 pivotal trials (GC-010, GC-012) evaluated the safety and efficacy of a single administration of one of two travoprost intraocular implants (slow-eluting, fast-eluting) vs timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension on 0-2 IOP-lowering medications. Data for the slow-eluting implant (iDose TR) are reported here.

Methods : The 2 multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials included a total of 383 slow-eluting travoprost intraocular implant patients (200 in GC-010, 183 in GC-012) and 386 timolol control patients (193 in GC-010, 193 in GC-012). The primary efficacy endpoint was non-inferiority to the active comparator, twice-daily topical timolol 0.5%, based on change from baseline in IOP at 8AM and 10AM at Day 10, Week 6 and Month 3. Safety was evaluated through Month 12, including adverse events and ophthalmic assessments.

Results : Over the first 3 months, mean IOP reductions from baseline for the travoprost implant groups were 6.6-8.5 mmHg and 6.7-8.4 mmHg in the GC-010 and GC-012 trials, respectively; and 6.6-7.7 mmHg and 6.8-7.2 mmHg for the timolol groups in the GC-010 and GC-012 trials, respectively. At Month 12, 93% of travoprost implant patients vs 67% of timolol patients were well-controlled on the same or fewer IOP-lowering topical medications compared to screening; and 81% of travoprost implant patients were free of topical IOP-lowering medications. Conjunctival hyperemia occurred in 3% of travoprost implant patients; no patients had clinically significant endothelial cell loss, periorbital fat atrophy, or serious corneal adverse events.

Conclusions : The travoprost implant achieved the pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint of non-inferiority to topical timolol, with a favorable safety profile and a high proportion of patients remaining topical IOP-lowering medication-free through Month 12.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×