Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 64, Issue 8
June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Qualitative analysis of digitally-printed versus hand-painted artificial eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Taras Gout
    Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Jessica Kawalek
    University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Emma Nicklin
    University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Florien Boele
    University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Judith Watson
    University of York, York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Taras Gout None; Jessica Kawalek None; Emma Nicklin None; Florien Boele None; Judith Watson None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIHR201559
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4244. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Taras Gout, Jessica Kawalek, Emma Nicklin, Florien Boele, Judith Watson; Qualitative analysis of digitally-printed versus hand-painted artificial eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4244.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Artificial eye users often face significant psychological impact after traumatic loss or surgically necessitated removal of an eye. Although there is growing research interest in artificial eye manufacture and service provision, there is still limited amount of tested research methodology and clinical data. The qualitative component of this feasibility cross-over study, PERSONAL-EYE-S, explored quality of life, personal experiences, and satisfaction with engaging in the research. This was with respect to traditional hand painted and novel digitally printed artificial eyes. These findings should develop the foundations of qualitative methodology and trial data in this growing sphere of research.

Methods : The qualitative stream had two components in order to build a more comprehensive understanding of the research area. The first was semi-structured interviews with participants and their close contacts, such as a family members, to develop an appreciation of the patient perspective. The second was interviews with a range of healthcare professionals involved in the service provision, which would provide a more holistic view of the service. Transcript review was performed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results : There were twenty two interviews performed: twelve artificial eye users, five close contacts, and five healthcare professionals. Our findings highlight the specific positives and negatives of both digitally-printed and hand-painted eyes. Overall, the key findings were of artificial eyes being preferred when they have an accurate colour match, appear realistic, and are manufactured quickly. The results confirmed that artificial eye users' social and psychological wellbeing is affected often for many years after the eye removal. Finally participation in the current feasibility study patient pathway was well accepted.

Conclusions : This study builds on the limited qualitative literature investigating artificial eye user experience in relation to their quality of life. Key positive and negative factors associated with digitally-printed and hand-painted artificial eyes were identified. Importantly, additional psychological support is required after the loss of an eye to help with both social and emotional wellbeing.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×