June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Subperiosteal and Orbital Abscesses: A Comparison of Clinical Features, Management, and Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alison Gibbons
    School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Ava Niknahad
    School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Colin Bacorn
    Division of Oculoplastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Emily Li
    Division of Oculoplastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alison Gibbons None; Ava Niknahad None; Colin Bacorn None; Emily Li None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4058. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alison Gibbons, Ava Niknahad, Colin Bacorn, Emily Li; Subperiosteal and Orbital Abscesses: A Comparison of Clinical Features, Management, and Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4058.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Orbital cellulitis (OC)-related subperiosteal (SPA) and orbital abscess (OA) formation are vision- and life-threatening conditions. Considerations and consequences of SPA and OA as distinct processes are poorly defined. We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare clinical features, management, and outcomes between adolescent and adult patients with SPA and those with OA.

Methods : A retrospective chart review was conducted using a medical record search of OC ICD codes from 1/1/2000 to 9/10/2022. Charts were screened for those with radiographic evidence of SPA or OA. Exclusion criteria included age younger than 9 years and those with simultaneous SPA and OA. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted. Primary outcomes included rates of surgical intervention, reoperation, and readmission; as well as length of hospital stay (LOS) and final vision. Fishers Exact, Mann-Whitney U, and Logistic Regression tests were used to compare OA and SPA cohorts with an α of 0.05 to indicate significance.

Results : A total of 120 patients, 91 with SPA and 29 with OA, met criteria. The SPA group was 61.5% male with a mean age of 29.9 ± 23.4 years, while the OA group was 48.3% male with a mean age of 46.7 ± 18.3 years (p<0.001, p<0.001). Sinusitis was the most common risk factor for both (92.3% SPA, 65.5% OA, p<0.001), and OA was more likely to occur in association with orbital trauma (34.5% vs 13.2%, p=0.014) or implanted hardware (10.3% vs 1.1%, p=0.043). OA patients more often presented with a relative afferent pupillary defect (17.2% vs 4.4%, p=0.027) and vision worse than 20/50 (55.2% vs 25.3%, p<0.001). While rates of surgery (71.4% vs 79.3%, p=0.717) were similar, SPA more commonly underwent combined external and endoscopic drainage (29.6% vs 4.3%, p=0.035) while OA more commonly underwent external drainage alone (78.3% vs 15.4%, p<0.001). OA was associated with a higher reoperation rate (18.6% vs 45.8%, p=0.014). Visual outcomes, LOS, and readmission rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions : History of orbital trauma or implanted hardware may carry greater risk of OA than SPA formation in OC. OA may present with more severe ophthalmic impairment than SPA and be treated with external drainage alone rather than combined surgery. With appropriate management, clinical outcomes are similarly favorable for SPA and OA.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×