June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Thermographic performance of two eyelid warming devices for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Fernando Morales-Wong
    University Hospital “Dr Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez”, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon Facultad de Medicina, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Luis F. Rua-Mojica
    Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica (FIME), Laboratory for Research and Innovation in Energy Technology (LIITE),, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolas de los Garza, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • Marissa Lizeth Fernandez-de Luna
    University Hospital “Dr Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez”, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon Facultad de Medicina, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Fausto Sanchez-Cruz
    Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica (FIME), Laboratory for Research and Innovation in Energy Technology (LIITE),, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolas de los Garza, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho
    University Hospital “Dr Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez”, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon Facultad de Medicina, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Simon Martínez-Martínez
    Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica (FIME), Laboratory for Research and Innovation in Energy Technology (LIITE),, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolas de los Garza, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
  • Karim Mohamed-Noriega
    University Hospital “Dr Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez”, Department of Ophthalmology, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon Facultad de Medicina, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Fernando Morales-Wong None; Luis F. Rua-Mojica None; Marissa Fernandez-de Luna None; Fausto Sanchez-Cruz None; Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho None; Simon Martínez-Martínez None; Karim Mohamed-Noriega None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4009. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Fernando Morales-Wong, Luis F. Rua-Mojica, Marissa Lizeth Fernandez-de Luna, Fausto Sanchez-Cruz, Jesús Mohamed-Hamsho, Simon Martínez-Martínez, Karim Mohamed-Noriega; Thermographic performance of two eyelid warming devices for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4009.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the warming and cooling behavior of the eyelids and ocular surface using two eyelid-warming devices to treat MGD.

Methods : This was a prospective, comparative study. All patients received two eyelid-warming therapies at different time points, using an eye mask and MiBo Thermoflo®, for 10 minutes. Thermography evaluation was performed with an infrared camera, temperature (in celsius degrees, °C) was recorded at different moments: before warming therapy, at middle of the session (5 minutes), at the end of therapy (10 minutes) and every minute for 4 minutes after treatment (cooling phase). Temperature was evaluated in upper eyelid, lower eyelid, central cornea, nasal conjunctiva, and temporal conjunctiva. Room temperature was controlled.

Results : Twenty eyes were analyzed. Temperature at the MiBo® tip was 46.3 throughout the session, and at the eye mask surface was 41.2 at the beginning and 39.9 at the end of the session. Mean temperature in tissues at 10 minutes with eye mask and MiBo were as follows: cornea 37.7 and 39.1 (p=0.002), upper eyelid 38.4 and 39.7 (p=0.014), lower eyelid 37.7 and 37.6 (p=0.124), nasal conjunctiva 37.6 and 39.0 (p=0.017), temporal conjunctiva 37.5 and 38.1 (p=0.312).
The increase in temperature from the beginning of treatment until the end, with eye mask and MiBo were as follows: cornea: 3.8 and 4.6 (p=0.002), upper eyelid: 3.7 and 4.4 (p=0.014), lower eyelid: 3.6 and 3.0 (p=0.124), nasal conjunctiva: 3.1 and 3.8 (p=0.017), and temporal conjunctiva: 3.4 and 3.6 (p=0.312). Mean temperature in tissues 1 minute after end of treatment with eye mask and MiBo were as follow: Cornea: 35.8 and 35.8, upper eyelid: 36.6 and 36.4, lower eyelid: 36.3 and 34.8, nasal conjunctiva: 36.1 and 36.4, temporal conjunctiva: 35.9 and 35.6. Mean reduction in celsius degrees as compared with final values at 10 minutes of treatment with eye mask and MiBo were as follows: Cornea: -1.9 and -3.3 (p<0.001), upper eyelid: -1.8 and -3.3 (p<0.001), lower eyelid: -1.5 and -2.8 (p<0.001), nasal conjunctiva: -1.5 and -2.6 (p=0.017), temporal conjunctiva: -1.6 and -2.5 (p<0.001).

Conclusions : Both treatments increased temperature in eyelids and ocular surface, however it varies between the tissues evaluated. Mibo generates greater temperature raises than eye mask, but within safe limits to the cornea. At 1 minute of cooling phase both treatments reached tissue temperatures similar to basal values.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×