June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Explantation of subretinal prostheses with planar and 3-D configurations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mohajeet Balveer Bhuckory
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
    Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Andrew Shin
    Material Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Bing-Yi Wang
    Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
    Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Ludwig Galambos
    Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Theodore Kamins
    Material Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Daniel V Palanker
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
    Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Mohajeet Bhuckory None; Andrew Shin None; Bing-Yi Wang None; Ludwig Galambos None; Theodore Kamins Pixium Vision, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Daniel Palanker Pixium Vision, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Pixium Vision, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH (Grants R01-EY-027786, and P30-EY-026877), DoD (Grant W81XWH-19-1-0738), AFOSR (Grant FA9550-19-1-0402), Wu Tsai Institute of Neurosciences at Stanford, and unrestricted grant from the Research to Prevent Blindness. Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF) and Stanford Nanofabrication Facility (SNF), which are supported by the National Science Foundation award ECCS1542152
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4609. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mohajeet Balveer Bhuckory, Andrew Shin, Bing-Yi Wang, Ludwig Galambos, Theodore Kamins, Daniel V Palanker; Explantation of subretinal prostheses with planar and 3-D configurations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4609.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : In patients with geographic atrophy, planar subretinal photovoltaic implants provided prosthetic acuity up to 20/440 – closely matching the 100mm pixels size. However, significant decrease of the pixel size is not possible due to fundamental limits of the electric field penetration depth with planar bipolar pixels. To overcome this limitation, we developed 3-dimensional implants: with pillar and honeycomb-shaped electrodes. In this study, we assess feasibility of safe removal of these implants for potential replacement with newer generation devices.

Methods : Three types of the subretinal silicon-based implants have been studied: 1mm-wide devices with 25µm-deep honeycomb-shaped wells and pixel widths of 40, 30 and 20 µm; 1.5mm-wide devices with 35µm-high pillars with pixels of 30µm pitch; and flat photovoltaic PRIMA implants 1.5 mm in width from Pixium-Vision. Devices were implanted beneath the degenerate rat retina (RCS, p180-300), and the retinal integration was monitored by OCT imaging. After 6 weeks, the retina was detached and the devices were gently separated by subretinal BSS injection between the retina and implant and then removed. A new planar device was placed in the same location and allowed to recover for 6 weeks before eyes were collected for histology and immunohistochemistry analysis.

Results : Retinal integration with 3-D implants was observed by OCT after 6 weeks. Device removal was successful with all three types of implants: flat, wells and pillars of all sizes, and OCT showed preserved retinal structure. Immunohistochemistry showed preserved bipolar cells with minimal glial scaring. Cellular residues on devices were identified as IBA1 positive cells, indicating microglial cells remaining on the implants after extraction. Re-implantation of the new devices in the extraction location demonstrated de nouveau INL integration with the new implant by OCT.

Conclusions : Flat, honeycomb and pillar implants can be successfully implanted, explanted and re-implanted in a rodent model of retinal degeneration. The surgical steps are feasible, and the postoperative and histological follow-up showed good inner retinal preservation. In human eyes, such surgery should be easier compared to much smaller (5-6 mm diameter) rat eyes.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×