June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
The cost-effectiveness of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection and panretinal photocoagulation for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Donghyun Jee
    Ophthalmology, Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Donghyun Jee None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 2290. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Donghyun Jee; The cost-effectiveness of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection and panretinal photocoagulation for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):2290.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection (VEGF) compared to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Methods : We assessed cost-effectiveness by simulating four treatment strategies using PRP and the anti-VEGF injection by constructing a Markov model for a hypothetical cohort of fifty-year-old PDR patients. Four treatment Interventions are as follows: (1) PRP only (covered by South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service [NHIS]); (2) the anti-VEGF injection only; (3) PRP first; and (4) the anti-VEGF injection first for PDR treatment. We used main outcomes as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the other three strategies compared to the PRP only strategy.

Results : In this cost-effectiveness analysis, the ICER, compared to the PRP only strategy, was $95,456 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for the PRP first strategy, $34,375 per QALY for the anti-VEGF injection first strategy, and $33,405 per QALY for the anti-VEGF injection only strategy from a healthcare perspective. From the societal and payer perspective, the anti-VEGF injection only strategy was the most cost-saving and most effective tactic compared to the PRP only strategy. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the PRP only strategy was cost-effective up to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of about $42,000, while the anti-VEGF injection only strategy was cost-effective thereafter from a healthcare perspective. From the societal and payer perspectives, regardless of the value of WTP, the anti-VEGF injection only strategy was the most cost-effective one.

Conclusions : The anti-VEGF injection only strategy for PDR was cost-effective from the societal and payer perspectives. Hence, our results on the cost-effectiveness of the anti-VEGF injection for PDR, alone or in combination with PRP treatment, can be used as important evidence when making medical service decisions.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Schematic diagram for transition of health states of diabetic retinopathy

Schematic diagram for transition of health states of diabetic retinopathy

 

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve from probabilistic sensitivity analysis

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve from probabilistic sensitivity analysis

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×