June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Binding Characteristics of the VEGF Arm of a Novel Bispecific Protein RO-101 in Comparison to Faricimab-svoa
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Parth Patel
    Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United States
  • Li Xu
    RevOpsis, Delaware, United States
  • Megana Paidela
    Glenwood High School, Chatham, Illinois, United States
  • John Mitchell Kunzeman
    Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, United States
  • Jessi Prentice
    Springfield Clinic LLP, Springfield, Illinois, United States
  • Mark Barakat
    Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Robert Lowenthal
    Springfield Clinic LLP, Springfield, Illinois, United States
  • Arshad M. Khanani
    Sierra Eye Associates, Nevada, United States
    University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Peter M Kaiser
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jeffrey S Heier
    OCB, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Jeffrey L. Olson
    University of Colorado Sue Anschutz Eye Center, Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • Ramanath Bhandari
    Springfield Clinic LLP, Springfield, Illinois, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Parth Patel None; Li Xu RevOpsis Therapeutics, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Megana Paidela None; John Kunzeman None; Jessi Prentice Regeneron, Kodiak Biosciences, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Regenxbio , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), RevOpsis Therapeutics, Code O (Owner); Mark Barakat AbbVie, Adverum Biotech, Alcon, Allegro, Allergan, Alimera, Annexon, Apellis, Arctic Vision, Biogen, Bausch and Lomb, Clearside Biomedical, EyePoint Pharma, Kodiak Sciences, Gemini Therapeutics, Genentech, Graybug, Gyroscope Therapeutics, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Oculis, Opthea, Outlook Therapeutics, Oxular, Oxurion, Palatin Technologies, Regeneron, RegenxBio, ReNeuron, Ribomic, Roche, Stealth Biotherapeutics, Unity Biotechnology , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), NeuBase,Oxurion, RevOpsis Therapeutics, Code O (Owner); Robert Lowenthal Regeneron, Kodiak Biosciences, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Regenxbio, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), RevOpsis Therapeutics, Code O (Owner); Arshad Khanani None; Peter Kaiser AffaMed Therapeutics, Allergan, Bayer, Bausch and Lomb, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Clearside Biomedical, Coherus, Innovent, Kanghong, Kodiak, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Regeneron, RegenxBio, Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), RevOpsis Therapeutics, Code O (Owner); Jeffrey Heier 2020 Onsite, 4DMT, Abpro, Adverum, Allegro, Allergan, Annexon, Apellis, Asclepix, Aviceda, BVT, DTx, Gemini, Genetech/Roche, Graybug, Gyroscope, iRenix, Iveric, Johnson & Johnson, Kang Horn, NGM, Notal Vision, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Ocuphire, OcuTerra, Oriole, Oxurion, Regeneron, Regenxbio, Relay Therapeutics, RetinAI, Retrotope, Roche, Stealth Biotherapeutics, Surrozen, Thea, Unity Bio, Verseon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Ocular Therapeutix, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), : Aldeyra, Apellis, Asclepix, Bayer, Genentech, Gyroscope, Iveric, Janssen R&D, Kanghong, Kodiak, NGM, Notal Vision, Novartis, Regeneron, Regenxbio, Code F (Financial Support), : Adverum, Aldeyra, Allegro, Aviceda, DTx Pharma, jCyte, Ocular Therapeutix, Vinci, Vitranu, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Jeffrey Olson RevOpsis Therapeutics, 2C Tech, Code O (Owner); Ramanath Bhandari Regeneron, Kodiak Biosciences, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Regenxbio , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), RevOpsis Therapeutics, Code O (Owner)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 738. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Parth Patel, Li Xu, Megana Paidela, John Mitchell Kunzeman, Jessi Prentice, Mark Barakat, Robert Lowenthal, Arshad M. Khanani, Peter M Kaiser, Jeffrey S Heier, Jeffrey L. Olson, Ramanath Bhandari; Binding Characteristics of the VEGF Arm of a Novel Bispecific Protein RO-101 in Comparison to Faricimab-svoa. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):738.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to investigate the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) arm of a novel bispecific protein, RO-101, in comparison to Faricimab-svoa (first bispecific monoclonal antibody used in neovascular eye diseases). RO-101 binds both VEGF-A and Angiopoietin 2, which are two key intermediates in the pathway for neovascularization. VEGF165 and VEGF121 are two intermediates in neovascularization that will be used to analyze the binding of RO-101 and Faricimab-svoa.

Methods : An Enzyme-linked Immunoassay (ELISA) was utilized to determine the EC50 of RO-101 to recombinant human VEGF165 (rhVEGF165) and VEGF121 (rhVEGF121) . The binding of rhVEGF165 and rhVEGF121 binding in the ELISA were detected by DkHumIgGFc-HRP. SgG1 or IgG1 were tested in duplicates starting at 10 nM; 1:3 serial dilutions. Corning 9017 medium binding plate was used and OD450 nm was measured by Victor 3 (PerkinElmer 1420 Multilabel Counter). In a second assay, an ELISA was used to determine the IC50 of RO-101 and Faricimab-svoa to VEGF165and VEGF R2/KDR Receptor. Inhibition of rhVEGF165 and rhKDR receptor binding was detected by streptavidin-HRP.

Results : The EC50 of RO-101 binding to rhVEGF165 was found to be 0.0231 nM. Meanwhile, the EC50 of Faricimab-svoa binding to rhVEGF165 was found to be 0.0228 nM. The EC50 of RO-101 binding to rhVEGF121 was found to be 0.0086 nM and the EC50 of Faricimab-svoa binding to rhVEGF121 was found to be 0.0113 nM (Figure 1). The IC50 of RO-101 to rhVEGF165 was found to be at a lower concentration, 1.989 nM, than the IC50 of Faricimab-svoa, which was 6.471 nM (Figure 2).

Conclusions : The data suggests the EC50 for RO-101 to both VEGF165 and VEGF121 is similar to the EC50 of Faricimab-svoa when binding to both growth factors respectively. The IC50 data for the inhibition of rhVEGF165 and rhKDR receptor binding was 3.25 times weaker when binding with Faricimab-svoa compared with RO-101. The IC50 data is suggestive that RO-101 could be effective at lower concentrations than Faricimab-svoa.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1: Comparison of RO-101 binding to rhVEGF121 and rhVEGF165 vs Faricimab-svoa binding to rhVEGF121 and rhVEGF165.

Figure 1: Comparison of RO-101 binding to rhVEGF121 and rhVEGF165 vs Faricimab-svoa binding to rhVEGF121 and rhVEGF165.

 

Figure 2: Comparison of RO-101 inhibition of rhVEGF165+KDR vs Faricimab-svoa to rhVEGF+KDR vs control rhVEGF+KDR receptor.

Figure 2: Comparison of RO-101 inhibition of rhVEGF165+KDR vs Faricimab-svoa to rhVEGF+KDR vs control rhVEGF+KDR receptor.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×