June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing SB15 with Reference Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SriniVas R Sadda
    Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Se Joon Woo
    Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Mario Bradvica
    Clinical Hospital Center Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
  • Attila Vajas
    University of Debrecen, Clinical Center, Debrecen, Hungary
  • Min Sagong
    Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Jan Studnicka
    University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Králové, Czechia
  • Edward Wylegala
    Gabinet Okulistyczny Prof. Edward Wylegala, Katowice, Poland
  • Cheolmin Yun
    Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Michal Orski
    Rydygier Memorial Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland
  • Sergei Astakhov
    Pavlov First State Medical University of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Edit Tóth-Molnár
    Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • Adrienne Csutak
    University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
  • Lajos Enyedi
    Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Korhaz es Rendelointezet, Budapest, Hungary
  • Taehyung Kim
    Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Inkyung Oh
    Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Hyerin Jang
    Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   SriniVas Sadda Samsung Bioepis, Novartis, Bayer, Roche/Genentech, Allergan/Abbvie, Regeneron, Apellis, Iveric, Oxurion, Amgen, Optos, Heidelberg Engineering, Centervue, Notal, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Optos, Heidelberg Engineering, Centervue, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Topcon, Nidek, Code F (Financial Support); Se Joon Woo Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Mario Bradvica Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Attila Vajas Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Min Sagong Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Jan Studnicka Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Edward Wylegala Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Cheolmin Yun Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Michal Orski Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Sergei Astakhov Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Edit Tóth-Molnár Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Adrienne Csutak Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Lajos Enyedi Samsung Bioepis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Taehyung Kim Samsung Bioepis, Code E (Employment); Inkyung Oh Samsung Bioepis, Code E (Employment); Hyerin Jang Samsung Bioepis, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 464. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SriniVas R Sadda, Se Joon Woo, Mario Bradvica, Attila Vajas, Min Sagong, Jan Studnicka, Edward Wylegala, Cheolmin Yun, Michal Orski, Sergei Astakhov, Edit Tóth-Molnár, Adrienne Csutak, Lajos Enyedi, Taehyung Kim, Inkyung Oh, Hyerin Jang; Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing SB15 with Reference Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):464.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : SB15 is a proposed biosimilar to the reference aflibercept (AFL). Equivalence of primary endpoint [change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at Week 8] and comparable efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) up to 32 weeks between SB15 and AFL in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) were previously reported (Woo et al., AAO 2022). Here we present the results up to 56 weeks.

Methods : In this randomized, double-masked, multicenter study, nAMD patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either 2 mg SB15 (n=224) or AFL (n=225) every 4 weeks (q4w) for 3 consecutive intravitreal injections, followed by treatment q8w through Week 48. At Week 32, patients were re-randomized to either continue on their treatment (SB15/SB15 or AFL/AFL) or switch from AFL to SB15 (AFL/SB15). Efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and PK were assessed up to Week 56.

Results : Of the 449 patients, 438 patients were re-randomized at Week 32; continuing SB15 (SB15/SB15, n=219), continuing AFL (AFL/AFL, n=108), switching from AFL to SB15 (AFL/SB15, n=111); and total 425 patients completed 56-weeks of study. During the study, the improvements in BCVA up to Week 56 were comparable between treatment groups (Fig 1, 2). LS mean BCVA letter change from baseline to Week 56 was 7.3 for SB15 (n=224) vs 6.4 for AFL (n=113); 7.9 for AFL/SB15 vs 7.5 for AFL/AFL. Comparability in anatomical outcomes was demonstrated in all treatment groups up to Week 56. The safety, immunogenicity, and PK were also comparable between SB15/SB15 and AFL/AFL, as well as between AFL/SB15 and AFL/AFL up to Week 56 after re-randomization at Week 32. No new intraocular inflammation occurred or anti-drug antibodies developed after switching in the AFL/SB15 group.

Conclusions : SB15 demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and PK compared with AFL up to Week 56. Switching from AFL to SB15 had no treatment-emergent issues such as loss of efficacy, increased adverse events or increased immunogenicity.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Fig 1. LS mean BCVA change up to Week 56 between SB15 and AFL (full analysis set, multiple imputation). SB15 or AFL represents both patients who continued treatment (SB15/SB15 or AFL/AFL) and who discontinued before Week 32 (n=5 for SB15, n=5 for AFL).

Fig 1. LS mean BCVA change up to Week 56 between SB15 and AFL (full analysis set, multiple imputation). SB15 or AFL represents both patients who continued treatment (SB15/SB15 or AFL/AFL) and who discontinued before Week 32 (n=5 for SB15, n=5 for AFL).

 

Fig 2. LS mean BCVA change between switching (AFL/SB15) and continuing (AFL/AFL) groups (full analysis set, multiple imputation)

Fig 2. LS mean BCVA change between switching (AFL/SB15) and continuing (AFL/AFL) groups (full analysis set, multiple imputation)

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×