Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 64, Issue 8
June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Average refractive index of Cynomolgus monkey lenses remains constant with accommodation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Bianca Maceo Heilman
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
  • Fabrice Manns
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
  • Jean-Marie Parel
    Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami College of Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Bianca Maceo Heilman None; Fabrice Manns None; Jean-Marie Parel None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Institutes of Health Grants R01EY014225 and Center Grant P30EY14801; the Florida Lions Eye Bank and Beauty of Sight Foundation; Drs. HW Flynn Jr, KR Olsen and ME Hildebrandt, Drs. Raksha Urs and Aaron Furtado, the Henri and Flore Lesieur Foundation (JMP).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 3819. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bianca Maceo Heilman, Fabrice Manns, Jean-Marie Parel; Average refractive index of Cynomolgus monkey lenses remains constant with accommodation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):3819.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : During accommodation, lens shape changes produce changes in the axial refractive index distribution which may contribute to the change in lens power. The goal of this study is to quantify accommodative changes in the average axial refractive index.

Methods : 33 whole globes from 29 Cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis, ages: 4.1–17.9 years; post-mortem time: 15.9±15.7 hours) were dissected and mounted into a tissue chamber submerged in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) within a lens stretcher (Ehrmann et al., 2008). Experiments were performed by stretching the tissue radially outward from 0 mm (unstretched) to 2.5 mm (fully stretched). Time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was used to acquire cross-sectional images of the lens with stretching. ImageJ was used to determine the axial pixel coordinates of the anterior (AL) and posterior (PL) lens surfaces, the undistorted tissue chamber wall (W1), and the distorted wall below the lens (W2) from the OCT images. These coordinates were used to calculate the average refractive index of the lens at the unstretched and fully stretched positions (Uhlhorn et al., 2008). (Figure 1)

Results : On average, the refractive index was 1.417 ± 0.002 for the unstretched (accommodated) lens and 1.416 ± 0.002 for the fully stretched (relaxed) lens. There was no statistically significant change in refractive index with lens stretching (p-value = 0.10) or with age (p-value = 0.17). (Figure 2)

Conclusions : The average refractive index of the monkey lens remains constant with accommodation and does not show a significant age-dependence.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1: OCT images of an unstretched (left) and fully stretched (right) monkey lens. The anterior (AL) and posterior (PL) lens surfaces, the undistorted tissue chamber wall (W1, left and right) and the distorted wall below the lens (W2) are shown. W1 was calculated by taking the average of W1L and W1R.

Figure 1: OCT images of an unstretched (left) and fully stretched (right) monkey lens. The anterior (AL) and posterior (PL) lens surfaces, the undistorted tissue chamber wall (W1, left and right) and the distorted wall below the lens (W2) are shown. W1 was calculated by taking the average of W1L and W1R.

 

Figure 2: The change in average refractive index (fully stretched – unstretched lens) plotted with respect to the change in lens thickness with stretching (mm).

Figure 2: The change in average refractive index (fully stretched – unstretched lens) plotted with respect to the change in lens thickness with stretching (mm).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×