June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Efficient Anterior Chamber Cell Phantom Tracking Using Adaptive Scanning OCT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yuan Tian
    Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Mark Draelos
    Robotics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
    Ophthalmology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Ryan P McNabb
    Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Al-Hafeez Dhalla
    Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Anthony N Kuo
    Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Joseph Izatt
    Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yuan Tian None; Mark Draelos Horizon Surgical, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Ryan McNabb None; Al-Hafeez Dhalla None; Anthony Kuo None; Joseph Izatt None
  • Footnotes
    Support  US DOD ARMRAA W81XWH-20-1-0660
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 2917. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yuan Tian, Mark Draelos, Ryan P McNabb, Al-Hafeez Dhalla, Anthony N Kuo, Joseph Izatt; Efficient Anterior Chamber Cell Phantom Tracking Using Adaptive Scanning OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):2917.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can be used to image and monitor cells in the anterior chamber due to conditions such as iritis. However, detailed analysis of individual moving cells such as spectroscopic analysis may require tracking over multiple OCT volumes. Therefore, we propose efficient cell tracking using adaptive scanning OCT (Fig. 1) based on cornea-removed maximum intensity projections (MIPs).

Methods : First, we used a real-time graph-search algorithm to segment and remove the cornea from OCT volumes. Next, the adaptive scanning algorithm utilized cornea-removed MIPs to identify targets of interest (cells) and their direction of motion to plan and adapt subsequent scan patterns. For analysis, we determined the A-scan location of the centroid for cells tracked across >15 volumes and then averaged the A-scans to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The program updated the cell list if a new cell appeared or existing cells moved to a new position in the new volume. To test this approach, we used 10 µm radius polystyrene microbeads as cell phantoms. A custom SS-OCT system with a spot size radius of 32.2 µm was used to image an artificial anterior chamber with a phantom silicon rubber cornea after injection of a 0.17% microbead solution. 5 artificial anterior chambers were imaged, each for a minimum of 73 sequential OCT volumes.

Results : Example results are shown in Fig. 2. Compared with a simple raster scan pattern, the adaptive scan demonstrated up to 3.6× improvement (2540 ms/vol vs. 698 ms/vol) in the volume refresh rate. For each anterior chamber, a mean of 64.6 ± 17.5 microbeads were successfully tracked for at least 15 volumes.

Conclusions : With a higher OCT volume refresh rate by utilizing adaptive scanning, our cell tracking algorithm can efficiently track cells’ movement for future cell size classification and cell density estimation.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1. Comparison between adaptive scan pattern and raster scan pattern. (a) The ground truth MIP. (b) Adaptive scan pattern. The green box shows the scan path in detail. (c) A conventional raster scan.

Figure 1. Comparison between adaptive scan pattern and raster scan pattern. (a) The ground truth MIP. (b) Adaptive scan pattern. The green box shows the scan path in detail. (c) A conventional raster scan.

 

Figure 2. Cell tracking with adaptive scan. (a) Raw B-scan contained the phantom cornea and microbeads. (b) Raw MIP with the cornea. (c) The corresponding B-scan without the cornea. The blue area was the removed part. (d) The corresponding MIP without the cornea, the number was the index of the beads that had been tracked for at least 15 sequential volumes.

Figure 2. Cell tracking with adaptive scan. (a) Raw B-scan contained the phantom cornea and microbeads. (b) Raw MIP with the cornea. (c) The corresponding B-scan without the cornea. The blue area was the removed part. (d) The corresponding MIP without the cornea, the number was the index of the beads that had been tracked for at least 15 sequential volumes.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×