June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Electrophysiological characterization of active versus inactive birdshot retinochoroidopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christopher Ryan Rosenberg
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Elizabeth White
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Aseel Alsamarraie
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Sandip Suresh
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Wayne Tschetter
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Rene Choi
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Richard Weleber
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Phoebe Lin
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Mark E Pennesi
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Eric Suhler
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Paul Yang
    Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Christopher Rosenberg None; Elizabeth White None; Aseel Alsamarraie None; Sandip Suresh None; Wayne Tschetter None; Rene Choi None; Richard Weleber None; Phoebe Lin None; Mark Pennesi None; Eric Suhler None; Paul Yang None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by grant P30 EY010572 from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), and by unrestricted departmental funding from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY), and by Foundation Fighting Blindness TRAP1 Award TA-NMT-0521-0803-OHSU-TRAP (Columbia, MD)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 5208. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher Ryan Rosenberg, Elizabeth White, Aseel Alsamarraie, Sandip Suresh, Wayne Tschetter, Rene Choi, Richard Weleber, Phoebe Lin, Mark E Pennesi, Eric Suhler, Paul Yang; Electrophysiological characterization of active versus inactive birdshot retinochoroidopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):5208.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Birdshot retinochoroidopathy (BSRC) is a chronic disease that typically requires treatment, and monitoring of disease course is supported by imaging, perimetry, and full field electroretinography (ffERG), which is an objective measure for quantifying generalized retinal function. The aim of this study is to characterize the ffERG features of active versus inactive BSRC.

Methods : A retrospective case-control study was performed at Casey Eye Institute. All patients with BSRC and ffERG testing between the years 1999–2019 were included. Active or inactive disease status was determined by chart review. Healthy controls were used for comparison. Amplitude (A) and implicit time (T) for the standard components of the waveforms were analyzed using a linear nested mixed-effects model, controlling for inter-eye correlation, age, and multiple comparisons (Bonferroni adjusted α=0.017).

Results : 70 patients were included: 47 control, 17 active, and 6 inactive. The following were statistically significant (see Table): Active BSCR had higher a-wave A and lower b:a wave A ratio than controls for the photopic responses (p=0.0007, 0.0002). Active BSCR had slower T than either inactive BSCR or controls for bright scotopic a-wave (p=0.0003, 0.0004), photopic b-wave (p=0.015, <0.0001), and 30 Hz flicker (p=0.002, 0.0003). Inactive BSCR also had slower T than controls for 30 Hz flicker (p<0.0001).

Conclusions : This study confirms that active BSRC frequently slows responses arising from dark- and light-adapted photoreceptors and bipolar cells. Decreased photopic b:a wave ratios were associated with supernormal amplitudes of the a-wave without a reduction in the b-wave, suggesting that inflammation in BSRC may cause irritability of light-adapted cone photoreceptor-driven responses. Indeed, supernormal photopic a-wave amplitudes has been reported in early stage BSRC and other causes of intraocular inflammation. The 30 Hz flicker peak time could differentiate between active BSRC, inactive BSRC, and control, which further supports its usefulness as a ffERG parameter in BSRC. While the 30 Hz flicker response is often regarded as a sensitive measure of cone-driven responses, the cellular mechanism behind its sensitivity as a biomarker of clinical disease status in BSRC is unknown.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×