June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Can a polygenic score for refractive error identify infants at risk of strabismus and amblyopia?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jeremy A Guggenheim
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Rosie Clark
    Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Cathy Williams
    Centre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jeremy Guggenheim None; Rosie Clark None; Cathy Williams None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Fight for Sight UK (Ref: 24WG201)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4176. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jeremy A Guggenheim, Rosie Clark, Cathy Williams; Can a polygenic score for refractive error identify infants at risk of strabismus and amblyopia?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4176.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : High refractive error in infancy is a risk factor for strabismus and amblyopia. We recently derived a polygenic score (PGS) quantifying an individual’s genetic susceptibility to spherical equivalent refractive error (SER). The PGS explains 15-19% of the variance in SER in adults of European ancestry. We tested the hypothesis that the PGS can identify those at risk of strabismus and amblyopia.

Methods : Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) participants aged 7 years-old were examined by an orthoptist. Habitual visual acuity (hVA) and pinhole habitual visual acuity (pVA) were measured for each eye (ETDRS chart at 4 meters). Strabismus was detected by cover test. SER was estimated by non-cycloplegic autorefraction (average for the two eyes). Amblyopia was defined as a 2-line difference in logMAR VA (better of hVA and pVA in each eye). A PGS was calculated for each child based on 770,000 genetic variants distributed across the genome. Firth logistic regression analyses were performed in 6,104 participants of European ancestry, for the outcomes: esotropia, exotropia and amblyopia.

Results : A one standard deviation increase in the PGS was associated with an odds ratio (OR)=1.45 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.78; P=0.0004) increased risk of esotropia; OR=0.67 (0.48 to 0.94; P=0.02) reduced risk of esotropia and an OR=1.39 (1.09 to 1.79; P=0.009) increased risk of amblyopia. However, the highest and lowest deciles of the PGS showed limited enrichment of affected individuals, compared to the extreme deciles of SER (Figure).

Conclusions : A state-of-the-art PGS for refractive error was only weakly predictive of esotropia, exotropia and amblyopia. A PGS with much greater accuracy would be required to achieve clinical utility.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Absolute risk of esotropia (A,B), exotropia (C,D) and amblyopia (E,F) in 7-year-old children stratified by deciles of a PGS (A,C,E) or deciles of SER (B,D,F). The dashed line is the baseline risk in the full sample. The values at the top of each panel are the number of affected children in each decile. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals.

Absolute risk of esotropia (A,B), exotropia (C,D) and amblyopia (E,F) in 7-year-old children stratified by deciles of a PGS (A,C,E) or deciles of SER (B,D,F). The dashed line is the baseline risk in the full sample. The values at the top of each panel are the number of affected children in each decile. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×