June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Automated Measurement of RNFL Thickness from OCT Scans Using a Deep Learning Segmentation Free Approach
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Benton Gabriel Chuter
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Justin Huynh
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Mark Christopher
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Ruben Gonzalez
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Evan Walker
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Sally L. Baxter
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
    Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, California, United States
  • Akram Belghith
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Christopher Bowd
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Michael Henry Goldbaum
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Jeffrey M Liebmann
    Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Massimo Antonio Fazio
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Christopher A Girkin
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Robert N Weinreb
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Linda M Zangwill
    Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Benton Chuter None; Justin Huynh None; Mark Christopher AISight Health, Code P (Patent); Ruben Gonzalez None; Evan Walker None; Sally Baxter voxelcloud.io, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Optomed, Topcon, Code F (Financial Support), iVista Medical Education, Code R (Recipient); Akram Belghith None; Christopher Bowd None; Michael Goldbaum None; Jeffrey Liebmann Allergan, Genentech, Thea, Bausch & Lomb, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Novartis, Research to Prevent Blindness , Code F (Financial Support); Massimo Fazio National Eye Institute, EyeSight Foundation of Alabama, Research to Prevent Blindness, Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Topcon and Wolfram Research, Code F (Financial Support); Christopher Girkin National Eye Institute,Heidelberg Engineering and Topcon, EyeSight Foundation of Alabama, Research to Prevent Blindness, Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Code F (Financial Support); Robert Weinreb Abbvie, Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Allergan, Equinox, Iantrek, Implandata, Nicox, Topcon Medica, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bausch & Lomb, Topcon Medical, Heidelberg Engineering, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Optovue, Centervue, Code F (Financial Support), Toromedes, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code P (Patent); Linda Zangwill Abbvie Inc. Topcon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), National Eye Institute, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Optovue Inc., Topcon Medical Systems Inc., Code F (Financial Support), Zeiss Meditec AISight Health , Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support   This work is supported by National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute Grants (R01EY029058, R01EY11008, R01EY034146, R01EY19869, R01EY027510, R01EY026574, EY018926, P30EY022589, T35EY033704, K99EY030942); and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY). Also EY023704 (ADAGESIII), EY029058 (OCTA), 1T35EY033704, DP5OD029610. EY028284, EY026574. The sponsors and/or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 359. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Benton Gabriel Chuter, Justin Huynh, Mark Christopher, Ruben Gonzalez, Evan Walker, Sally L. Baxter, Akram Belghith, Christopher Bowd, Michael Henry Goldbaum, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Massimo Antonio Fazio, Christopher A Girkin, Robert N Weinreb, Linda M Zangwill; Automated Measurement of RNFL Thickness from OCT Scans Using a Deep Learning Segmentation Free Approach. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):359.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Analysis of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is a vital part of the diagnostic workup and management of glaucoma. Deep learning (DL) models often perform automatic segmentation of the RNFL to provide diagnostic assistance for glaucoma. However, each instrument uses proprietary algorithms for their retinal layer segmentation. A segmentation free approach may facilitate harmonization of RNFL thickness across instruments. The purpose of this study is to assess whether a segmentation free approach can be used to train a DL model to automatically measure the RNFL thickness maps from OCT.

Methods : A set of 22,464 OCT Spectralis optic nerve head (ONH) circle scans from the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) datasets were gathered. Data were split on the patient level into training (571 patients, 969 eyes, 20,528 images) and testing (48 patients, 83 eyes, 1936 images) sets. Each circle scan had a corresponding RNFL thickness map consisting of 768 measurements in µm, with an average thickness of 83.0 +/- 21.0. µm. Three commonly used convolutional neural network (CNN) model architectures, ResNet50, Densnet121, and EfficientNetB0 were trained to predict the 768 thickness values from each corresponding OCT scan. Mean absolute error (MAE) was used as the loss function. Performance was measured using MAE, mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) averaged across all 768 thickness values.

Results : Results for automated RNFL thickness measurement are shown in figure 1. EfficientNetB0 achieved modestly better performance than ResNet50 and DenseNet121 with MAEs of 20.2, 21.4 and 20.0 um respectively on the testing set. Training and testing loss curves for the ResNet50 model are shown in figure 2. Upon initialization, the model begins with an average MAE of roughly 80 µm, and within 20 epochs, converges to an MAE of roughly 20 µm.

Conclusions : A DL model can automatically measure RNFL thickness from OCT with reasonable performance, without using segmentation labels. A segmentation free approach may be more feasible for training deep learning models, and merits further investigation.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1: Results on RNFL thickness measurement for the testing set.

Figure 1: Results on RNFL thickness measurement for the testing set.

 

Figure 2: Loss curve for ResNet50, measured in MAE (micrometers) for given number of epochs.

Figure 2: Loss curve for ResNet50, measured in MAE (micrometers) for given number of epochs.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×