June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Integration of structural data into perimetric examinations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Giovanni Ometto
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
    National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Josephine C Evans
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
  • David Crabb
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Giovanni Montesano
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
    National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Giovanni Ometto Alcon-Ivantis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Relayer Ltd, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Josephine Evans None; David Crabb AbbVie/Allergan; Apellis; Janssen, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), AbbVie/Allergan; Apellis; Santen, Code F (Financial Support), AbbVie/Allergan; Santen; Thea; Glaukos, Code R (Recipient); Giovanni Montesano Centervue-iCare, Omikron Spa, Alcon-Ivantis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Relayer Ltd, Code I (Personal Financial Interest)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 1311. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Giovanni Ometto, Josephine C Evans, David Crabb, Giovanni Montesano; Integration of structural data into perimetric examinations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):1311.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To test the improvement in speed and accuracy of a perimetric strategy that integrates structural information using the Open Perimetry Interface (OPI).

Methods : Data from ten healthy participants were collected using the Compass Automated Perimeter (CMP, CenterVue, Italy) through the OPI. A bespoke Shiny user interface (UI) was used to import Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scans collected with a Spectralis SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heideberg, Germany) of the macula and the optic nerve head (ONH) , then align them with the fundus image captured by the CMP at the beginning of the test (Figure 1). The test was performed using a 10-2 grid centred on the fovea of each participant, aligned with the fovea-ONH axis. The UI also designed to the Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL) thickness corresponding to each test location, after accounting for GC displacement. Two perimetric strategies were tested: standard ZEST with population-based prior distributions, and a Structural-ZEST (S-ZEST), enhanced with individual OCT data to determine the starting parameters. The starting priors for S-ZEST were modelled using an independent dataset of glaucoma and healthy subjects[CD1] . Tests with both strategies were repeated twice, in random order. All fundus images were aligned with the first test to ensure spatial consistency of the tested locations. Test-retest variability was quantified with Bland-Altman plots. Bootstrap was used to calculate confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values to compare the widths of the 95%-Limits of Repeatability (LoR). Correlation between GCL thickness and sensitivity (dB) and the difference in test duration was calculated using linear mixed effect models. Agreement was quantified with the mean difference between the results of the two strategies, after averaging the two repetitions.

Results : 95%-LoRs for S-ZEST were similar between the two devices (p = 0.829, Figure 2). The structure-function correlation was significant for both strategies (p < 0.001), and very similar between S-ZEST (R2 = 0.24) and ZEST (R2 = 0.23). There was a small but stastcally significant mean difference in sensitivity between S-ZEST and ZEST (0.56 [0.35, 0.77] dB, p = 0.034). S-ZEST was 2.7 [1.2, 3.5] minutes faster than ZEST (p < 0.001, Figure 2).

Conclusions : S-ZEST significantly reduced testing time without reducing repeatability in healthy observers. Further testing is required to validate this approach in patients with glaucoma.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×