June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Predicting glaucomatous visual field progression from baseline fundus photos using deep learning
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ruben Hemelings
    Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Damon W. K. Wong
    Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Jan Van Eijgen
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
  • Jacqueline Chua
    Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • João Barbosa Breda
    Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Medicina, Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Ingeborg Stalmans
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
  • Leopold Schmetterer
    Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ruben Hemelings None; Damon Wong None; Jan Van Eijgen None; Jacqueline Chua None; João Barbosa Breda None; Ingeborg Stalmans None; Leopold Schmetterer None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This work was funded by grants from the National Medical Research Council (CG/C010A/2017_SERI; OFLCG/004c/2018-00; MOH-000249-00; MOH-000647-00; MOH-001001-00; MOH-001015-00; MOH-000500-00; MOH-000707-00; MOH-001072-06), National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2019-THE002-0006 and NRF-CRP24-2020-0001), A*STAR (A20H4b0141), the Singapore Eye Research Institute & Nanyang Technological University (SERI-NTU Advanced Ocular Engineering (STANCE) Program), and the SERI-Lee Foundation (LF1019-1) Singapore.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 380. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ruben Hemelings, Damon W. K. Wong, Jan Van Eijgen, Jacqueline Chua, João Barbosa Breda, Ingeborg Stalmans, Leopold Schmetterer; Predicting glaucomatous visual field progression from baseline fundus photos using deep learning. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):380.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess the potential of deep learning techniques to predict visual field (VF) progression. We trained and validated a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a baseline fundus photo as input, to predict Mean Deviation (MD) rate of progression.

Methods : Data were retrospectively collected from the glaucoma clinic at the University Hospitals UZ Leuven, Belgium. Inclusion criteria were defined as having at least five reliable VF exams of the same type, collected over a period of at least 2.5 years. Reliable VF exams were defined as either a fixation loss ≤20% for Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 exams, or a false positive rate ≤15% for Octopus G1 exams (only in training set). Eligible fundus photos had to be captured within 200 days of the initial VF exam. Progression was defined as regressed MD rate (dB/year), with a cutoff between -0.5 and -1.5, coupled with a significant negative slope (p<0.1). Regression was obtained using ordinary least squares (OLS) or Huber robust regression (Fig 1). The eligible set consisted of 2382 eyes from 1527 individuals that were followed up and treated for glaucoma.

Preprocessed fundus images were used as input to a custom ResNet-50 CNN that was adapted to the prediction of VF progression. In total, 12 experiments were conducted: six using OLS, and six using Huber. Each experiment ran for 10 epochs (77 iterations with a batch size of 24), with the model weights averaged over the last five epochs. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC, (95% CI)].

Results : On average, eyes were followed up for more than five years, and had more than eight VF exams (Fig 2, Study Sample Info). The prevalence of progressors ranged from 4% to 15%, depending on the dB/y cutoff and regression type.

Using OLS regression and a cutoff at -0.5 yielded the best AUC [0.67 (0.58-0.76)] on the validation set of eyes with HFA exams (Fig 2, Results). Remarkably, only two experiments resulted in a significant AUC on the test set. The model with Huber regression, with a cutoff at -0.7, obtained an AUC of 0.65 (0.55-0.70).

Conclusions : Deep learning models can predict VF progressors from a baseline fundus photo with moderate accuracy. The potential effect of glaucoma treatment on this study outcome warrants further investigation. Future experiments should assess the added value of including fundus photos from multiple visits.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×