June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Test-Retest Reliability of Retinal Sensitivity in Concentric Perilesional Zones Using a Patient-Customized Microperimetry Grid
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Camille Beniga
    AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, United States
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Masara Issa
    AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Amber Lewis
    AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Kameran Lashkari
    Advanced Eye Centers Inc, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States
  • Karl G Csaky
    Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States
    AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Francisco J López
    AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Camille Beniga AbbVie, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Masara Issa AbbVie, Code E (Employment); Amber Lewis AbbVie, Code E (Employment); Kameran Lashkari None; Karl Csaky AbbVie, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Francisco López AbbVie, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 3343. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Camille Beniga, Masara Issa, Amber Lewis, Kameran Lashkari, Karl G Csaky, Francisco J López; Test-Retest Reliability of Retinal Sensitivity in Concentric Perilesional Zones Using a Patient-Customized Microperimetry Grid. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):3343.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Fixed grid microperimetry provides limited information in scotomatous areas. Feasibility and test-retest reliability of retinal sensitivity were determined in perilesional zones using a patient-customized microperimetry grid.

Methods : Two sites in the United States enrolled patients with geographic atrophy (n=11). Scotopic and mesopic microperimetry were done with an S-MAIA at Baseline, Day 7, Month 3, and Month 6. Placement of test points were as follows: 9 points on the patient's preferred retinal locus; ~50 evenly distributed points in two concentric rings 200 μm (Zone 1) and 450 μm (Zone 2) from the lesion border (Figure 1). Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman analyses, and the coefficient of repeatability (CR) quantified test-retest (Baseline-Day 7) reliability. Mean sensitivity readings per zone and illumination condition were used to estimate retinal zone sensitivities (decibels, dB) and annual progression rates (dB/year). All analyses were conducted using R Software (v4.2.2) under RStudio.

Results : Baseline characteristics are reported in a previous publication (Issa M, et al. IOVS 2022;63:ARVO E-Abstract 4544). Compared to scotopic, mesopic microperimetry resulted in stronger, positive correlations (p<0.05) and smaller Bland-Altman limits of agreement across the zones. Likewise, the range of CRs in all zones for scotopic was 14.5-31.7 dB vs. 5.0-7.8 dB for mesopic. Table 1 shows mean zone sensitivity by visit. For both illumination conditions, the progression rates typically showed a decrease in mean zone sensitivity over time.

Conclusions : Scotopic microperimetry, in general, showed higher variability and reduced reliability than mesopic microperimetry, appearing unreliable in this patient population. Under mesopic conditions, reliability assessments indicated that changes greater than ~8 dB could be considered meaningful. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of patient-customized grids, quantifies the reliability of the assessments, and provides the means for evaluation of therapeutic effects of drugs at diverse perilesional locations.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1: (A) Traditional Microperimetry Grid and (B) Patient-Customized Microperimetry Grid with Concentric, Perilesional Zones

Figure 1: (A) Traditional Microperimetry Grid and (B) Patient-Customized Microperimetry Grid with Concentric, Perilesional Zones

 

Table 1: Mean Zone Sensitivity Across Concentric Perilesional Zones Using a Patient-Customized Grid

Table 1: Mean Zone Sensitivity Across Concentric Perilesional Zones Using a Patient-Customized Grid

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×