June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Comparison of a handheld ultrasound to two standard ophthalmic ultrasound machines
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kristen Park
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Preeya Mehta
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Charlene Tran
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Alomi Parikh
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Cullen Barnett
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Jessica Chang
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Sandy Zhang-Nunes
    Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kristen Park None; Preeya Mehta None; Charlene Tran None; Alomi Parikh None; Cullen Barnett None; Jessica Chang None; Sandy Zhang-Nunes None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 5034. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kristen Park, Preeya Mehta, Charlene Tran, Alomi Parikh, Cullen Barnett, Jessica Chang, Sandy Zhang-Nunes; Comparison of a handheld ultrasound to two standard ophthalmic ultrasound machines. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):5034.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : While many studies comparing handheld ultrasound devices to standard ultrasounds have been conducted due to the increased use of handheld point-of-care ultrasound in medicine, there is a significant lack of research pertaining specifically to their role in ophthalmology. Expanding upon a previous study by our group comparing image quality between five handheld ultrasound devices in which the L20 (Clarius Mobile Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) received the highest image quality ratings, we compared the image quality of the handheld L20 to two standard ultrasound devices: the ABSolu (Ellex, Adelaide, Australia) and the Eye Cubed (Ellex, Adelaide, Australia).

Methods : Using three devices on one volunteer, one skilled ophthalmologist obtained five orbital and periorbital views: retina B-scan, meibomian glands, lacrimal gland, and orbicularis oculi muscle, and temporal artery. The L20 device, which has an ultrasound frequency range of 8-20 MHz, was set to the “Ocular” preset for the first four structures and to the “Vascular” preset for the fifth, respectively. A 50 Mhz UBM probe was used with the ABSolu and a 40 Mhz UBM probe with the EyeCubed. Four ophthalmologists and one experienced ophthalmic sonographer graded the image quality of each view on a four-point Likert scale: excellent (4), good (3), poor (2), and not visible (1). The data was analyzed using ANOVA tests with the significance level set to p < 0.05.

Results : The mean ratings were 3.48 for the L20, 2.43 for the Eye Cubed, and 2.37 for the ABSolu, with no statistically significant difference in ratings between the three devices (p = 0.089).

Conclusions : Handheld point-of-care ultrasound devices may be of adequate image quality overall when compared to standardized ultrasound machines. Our findings are promising in their implications that point-of-care ultrasound devices may be used reliably in a variety of ophthalmic settings.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1. Orbicularis oculi muscle, B-scan, and lacrimal gland shown on the Eye Cubed, ABSolu, and L20 with relevant structures indicated by white arrows.

Figure 1. Orbicularis oculi muscle, B-scan, and lacrimal gland shown on the Eye Cubed, ABSolu, and L20 with relevant structures indicated by white arrows.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×