June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
The surgeon’s subjective perception of robotic-assisted epiretinal membrane peeling – a pilot study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gabor Mark Somfai
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Spross Research Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Ferhat Turgut
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Spross Research Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Maarten J. Beelen
    Preceyes B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • Thijs C. M. Meenink
    Preceyes B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • Florian M. Heussen
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Spross Research Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Matthias D. Becker
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stadtspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Spross Research Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Gabor Somfai Allergan, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bayer, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Novartis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Roche, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Carl Zeiss, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Ferhat Turgut None; Maarten J. Beelen Preceyes B.V., Code E (Employment); Thijs C. M. Meenink Preceyes B.V., Code E (Employment); Florian M. Heussen None; Matthias D. Becker Roche, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 5287. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gabor Mark Somfai, Ferhat Turgut, Maarten J. Beelen, Thijs C. M. Meenink, Florian M. Heussen, Matthias D. Becker; The surgeon’s subjective perception of robotic-assisted epiretinal membrane peeling – a pilot study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):5287.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Membrane peeling during retinal surgery is a delicate step that needs precise completion in order to avoid retinal trauma. The Preceyes Surgical System (PSS; Preceyes B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) is a robotic assistive device that may enhance surgical precision. Our aim was to assess the surgeons’ subjective perception of robotic-assisted epiretinal membrane peeling (RA-MP).

Methods : RA-MP has been performed in 9 eyes of 9 patients by two experienced vitreoretinal surgeons. In three cases, the intervention was combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Immediately surgery, a questionnaire was filled out by the participants, with the following questions: “Use of the robot for peeling is easier compared to manual peeling” (Q1), “Executing peeling with the robot was less stressful compared to manual surgery” (Q2), “During the surgery, I experienced neither hand or arm strain” (Q3) and “Further use of the robot desired” (Q4). The answer options were the following: “strongly disagree”, ”disagree”, ”neutral”, ”agree” and ”strongly agree.” Due to the low number of cases, no statistical analysis was performed, and only raw data are reported.

Results : The responses for the questions were as follows: Q1 (3/1/4/1/0), Q2 (4/2/2/1/0), Q3 (0/0/1/0/8), and Q4 (0/0/2/1/6) for “strongly disagree”, ”disagree”, ”neutral”, ”agree” and ”strongly agree”, respectively. There was a trend towards increasing ease and less stress with time.

Conclusions : In our pilot study, the use of RA-MP led neither to hand nor arm strain and was engaging for vitreoretinal surgeons. It was well anticipated, being somewhat more complex than manual membrane peeling and somewhat more stressful, possibly attributable to its learning curve. A larger, randomized, prospective study is warranted to further elaborate on the above aspects.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1. Results of the postoperative questionnaires with respective response numbers above bars.

Figure 1. Results of the postoperative questionnaires with respective response numbers above bars.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×