June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Subjective vision differences with soft contact lenses for myopia control in children and teenagers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alex Nixon
    Johnson and Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  • Jie Xu
    Johnson and Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  • Noel A Brennan
    Johnson and Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  • Robert Morlock
    Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Xu Cheng
    Johnson and Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alex Nixon Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment); Jie Xu Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment); Noel Brennan Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment), Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code P (Patent); Robert Morlock Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Xu Cheng Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code E (Employment), Johnson and Johnson Vision, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4936. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alex Nixon, Jie Xu, Noel A Brennan, Robert Morlock, Xu Cheng; Subjective vision differences with soft contact lenses for myopia control in children and teenagers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4936.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Soft contact lenses for myopia control (MC) are often evaluated in younger children (≤12 years), but meaningful myopia progression can occur during the teenage years. We performed post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical study in myopic children to learn about subjective vision experience in soft contact lenses for MC by age.

Methods : This was a multi-site, single-masked, 3x3 crossover study with a run-in period. Healthy myopic children from 7 and 17 years old were recruited, balancing the number of children 7-12 years old with those 13-17 years. Subjects initially used a daily disposable (DD) soft contact lens (SCL) with conventional optics (1DAM) for one week, then lens wear sequence was randomized and subjects were fit with one of three MC SCLs for each of three, 2-week periods. There were two senofilcon A prototype MC SCLs with noncoaxial ring-focus designs (for enhancing efficacy [EE] and enhancing vision [EV]) and one omafilcon A dual-focus (DF) design. Subjective vision was assessed using the Pediatric Myopia Control Questionnaire (PMCQ) at the 2-week follow-up. An overall vision item was analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test to assess differences in top two box (T2B, excellent and very good) proportions between the two age groups for each lens type separately.

Results : The intent-to-treat population included 75 participants, with 38 from 7-12 years (mean 10.6 ± 1.05 years) and 37 from 13-17 years (mean 14.7 ± 1.31 years). Patient-reported overall vision by lens type and age is shown in Figure 1. A significant difference in T2B proportions by age was detected for EE (p=0.032) and approached for DF (p=0.053), but there was no significant difference for 1DAM (p=0.252) or EV (p=0.502). Two subjects discontinued due to unsatisfactory vision with a test article, both from the 13-17 age group.

Conclusions : The subjective visual impact of MC SCLs may be perceived differently in younger versus older children, with older children more judgmental of their vision experience, at least during the early period of wear. The subjective visual impact by age was design dependent, and a different balance of vision quality and myopia control efficacy may be prudent in older children to better fit their more critical assessment of vision quality and decreasing average annual rate of myopia progression.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1: The proportion of top two box responses regarding overall vision by lens type and age.

Figure 1: The proportion of top two box responses regarding overall vision by lens type and age.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×