June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Predicting OCT-morphological anti-VEGF treatment response in patients with neovascular age-related degeneration using artificial intelligence
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ben Asani
    Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
  • Nastassya Horlava
    Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Gesundheit und Umwelt, Munich, Bayern, Germany
  • Hannah Spitzer
    Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Gesundheit und Umwelt, Munich, Bayern, Germany
  • Fabian Theis
    Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Gesundheit und Umwelt, Munich, Bayern, Germany
  • Siegfried Priglinger
    Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
  • Johannes Schiefelbein
    Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ben Asani Novartis AG, Code F (Financial Support), Novartis AG, Code R (Recipient); Nastassya Horlava None; Hannah Spitzer None; Fabian Theis Immunai Inc., Singularity Bio B.V., CytoReason Ltd, Omniscope Ltd, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Dermagnostix GmbH, Cellarity, Code O (Owner); Siegfried Priglinger Abott, Alcon, Geuder, STAAR, TearLab, Thieme, Oculus, Schwind, Ziemer, Zeiss, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Abbott, Alcon, Hoya, Oculentis, Oculus, Schwind, Zeiss, Code F (Financial Support), Abott, Alcon, Geuder, STAAR, TearLab, Thieme, Oculus, Schwind, Ziemer, Zeiss, Code R (Recipient); Johannes Schiefelbein Novartis AG, Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  BMBF grant# 031L
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 332. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ben Asani, Nastassya Horlava, Hannah Spitzer, Fabian Theis, Siegfried Priglinger, Johannes Schiefelbein; Predicting OCT-morphological anti-VEGF treatment response in patients with neovascular age-related degeneration using artificial intelligence. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):332.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To make individualized predictions of patients’ morphological response to intravitreal injections with Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab and Aflibercept using a deep learning algorithm. For this purpose, we determined the minimal amount of data points necessary to predict the response type of a patient and the best performing classification method.

Methods : Training of a machine learning algorithm using different models (random forest algorithm, support vector machine, Logistic Regression, Ridge regression, fully connected neural network) to predict treatment response in treatment naïve patients after 90 days. Patients were categorized as good responder, poor responder and non-responder based on their resolution of fluids segmented by a previously built deep U-net based semantic segmentation ensemble algorithm. For the different algorithm models we used 413 patients as a training, 116 patients as a validation and 222 patients as a test set. All patients were treatment naïve.

Results : Using only the baseline OCT as input, F1 scores were best for the random forest algorithm model in the good and poor responder group (F1=0.9, precision=0.47, recall=0.9). Non responders were more difficult to predict albeit still achieving F1=0.43 using the support vector machine training model. Best overall results were achieved using both the baseline oct and the oct after the first intravitreal injection with the random forest algorithm achieving an F1 score of 0.9 for the good/poor responder group and 0.48 for the non-responder group. As expected, the predictions got more accurate when more visits were used as input data.

Conclusions : The predictive algorithm shows highly efficient prediction of patients’ treatment response especially in the good and poor responder group, while non-response prediction was moderate. Non-response is generally not very common whence accurate predicting will require a lot more input data in the future. This model can be used to further train and differentiate which medication is best suited for the present morphological structure to move towards a more personalized treatment regimen.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Performance of treatment response prediction using different machine learning models.

Performance of treatment response prediction using different machine learning models.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×