June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Comparing the Radius virtual reality perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Howard S. Barnebey
    Specialty Eyecare Centre, Washington, United States
  • Chris Bradley
    Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Jason Bacharach
    North Bay Eye Associates, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Howard Barnebey None; Chris Bradley Radius XR, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Jason Bacharach Radius XR, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Radius XR, Code F (Financial Support), Radius XR, Code I (Personal Financial Interest)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 5514. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Howard S. Barnebey, Chris Bradley, Jason Bacharach; Comparing the Radius virtual reality perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):5514.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The Radius is a lightweight virtual reality headset that performs automated perimetry. Self-administered visual field (VF) tests such as the Radius have the potential to significantly improve the ability to monitor glaucoma progression by enabling more frequent measurements of VFs in a patient’s home. In this preliminary non-randomized comparative case series, we compare estimated sensitivities of the Radius to those of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) on the 24-2 test pattern for 27 glaucoma and glaucoma suspect eyes. The Radius presents the Goldmann III stimulus on a 10 cd/m2 background, the same as the HFA.

Methods :
24-2 VFs were measured on 27 eyes from 19 patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect status at the North Bay Eye Associates using both the HFA (SITA-Standard algorithm) and the Radius (RATA Standard algorithm). Distributions of estimated sensitivities in the 15-40 dB range — the Radius has a dynamic range of 15-40 dB — were compared across all 54 test locations using the Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni correction (). Deming regression was used to estimate the slope of the best-fitting line between estimated sensitivities. Overall test times were also recorded

Results : Across 54 test locations, the smallest p-value for the Wilcoxon rank sum test was p = 0.0026, which is non-significant given the Bonferroni corrected . Figure 1 shows that the slope of the Deming regression line in the 15-40 dB range was 0.62 (the size of the circles in Figure 1 is proportional to the number of data points at that location). The relation is linear, but the slope of 0.62 demonstrates reduced dynamic range for the Radius within the HFA 15-40 dB range. Average test times for the Radius were less than for the HFA (see Figure 2): 5 minutes 36 seconds for the Radius and 6 minutes 28 seconds for the HFA.

Conclusions :
This preliminary study demonstrates statistical non-inferiority of estimated sensitivities from the Radius compared to those of the HFA for the 24-2 test pattern within the 15-40 dB range.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×