June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
The Posterior Auricular Muscle Complex Graft as an orbital implant wrap: long-term follow-up
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • John P Thompson
    Ophthalmology, LSU Health New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Thomas C Naugle
    Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Joshua R Ford
    Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Kyle V Acosta
    Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Chad M Caplan
    Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Constance L. Fry
    The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   John Thompson None; Thomas Naugle None; Joshua Ford None; Kyle Acosta None; Chad Caplan None; Constance Fry None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 4068. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John P Thompson, Thomas C Naugle, Joshua R Ford, Kyle V Acosta, Chad M Caplan, Constance L. Fry; The Posterior Auricular Muscle Complex Graft as an orbital implant wrap: long-term follow-up. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):4068.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The ideal orbital implant type for enucleation or evisceration is not yet determined. One consideration is the frequency of implant exposures and extrusions which can occur many years following the initial procedure. This study analyzes long term complication rates following porous orbital implant wrapping with a posterior auricular muscle complex graft (PAMCG) post-enucleation.

Methods : This is a multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent orbital implantation following enucleation using this technique between 1992 and 2013. Cases of three surgeons at two academic institutions were included. This study was IRB approved and HIPAA compliant. Only cases with a minimum of 18 months of follow-up were included. No patients underwent peg implantation. Patient’s demographics, follow-up time, type of implant, complications including wound dehiscence, exposure, postoperative infection, and extrusion were recorded.

Results : This study included 36 orbits of 36 patients with a mean age of 39.3 ± 23.2 years (range, 3 - 84 years). Thirty patients had hydroxyapatite implants and six had porous polyethylene. The average follow-up time was 12.6 ± 5.6 years (range, 1.5 - 30.3 years) (Table 1). There was one orbital infection necessitating implant removal (2.8%) with a likely mechanism of iatrogenic micro-exposure during a subsequent surgery for a forniceal contracture 14 years following implantation. One patient had anophthalmic enophthalmos which was treated with a secondary contralateral PAMCG graft. Other complications included one each of lagophthalmos, a fibrous lesion with lymphoid hyperplasia, and chronic conjunctivitis. There were no other known exposures, extrusions, or donor site complications.

Conclusions : Wrapping porous orbital implants with the PAMCG resulted in low complication rates over a thirty-year period. This tissue should be considered especially in patients with otherwise compromised orbital sockets, whether from radiation or other previous damage.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1. A, Dissection of superficial portion of the posterior auricular muscle complex followed by B, implantation of the wrapped orbital implant using a sheeting technique.

Figure 1. A, Dissection of superficial portion of the posterior auricular muscle complex followed by B, implantation of the wrapped orbital implant using a sheeting technique.

 

Table 1. Breakdown of follow-up by period of time and implant type.

Table 1. Breakdown of follow-up by period of time and implant type.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×