June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Electric Field Application and mTOR Activation Collaborate to Direct Optic Nerve Regeneration After Crush Injury
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Timothy Kim
    University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Sasha Medvidovic
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Phillip Lam
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Petcy Yao
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Ege Iseri
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Micalla Peng
    University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Anahit Simonyan
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Biju Thomas
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Mahnaz Shahidi
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Gianluca Lazzi
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Kimberly Gokoffski
    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Timothy Kim None; Sasha Medvidovic None; Phillip Lam None; Petcy Yao None; Ege Iseri None; Micalla Peng None; Anahit Simonyan None; Biju Thomas None; Mahnaz Shahidi None; Gianluca Lazzi None; Kimberly Gokoffski None
  • Footnotes
    Support  For this work, MGP and TK were supported by the USC Dean’s Research Scholar grant. KKG was supported by grants from NEI/NIH (K08EY031797), NSF (2121164), the Brightfocus Foundation, the Baxter Foundation, and the Ming Hsieh Foundation. GL and EI were supported by a grant from the NSF (2121164). This work was also supported by an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology from Research to Prevent Blindness and the NEI (P30EY029220). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. No funding sponsors were involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of report, or decision to submit the article for publication.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 1569. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Timothy Kim, Sasha Medvidovic, Phillip Lam, Petcy Yao, Ege Iseri, Micalla Peng, Anahit Simonyan, Biju Thomas, Mahnaz Shahidi, Gianluca Lazzi, Kimberly Gokoffski; Electric Field Application and mTOR Activation Collaborate to Direct Optic Nerve Regeneration After Crush Injury. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):1569.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Regenerating the optic nerve requires signals that both “fuel” and “steer” retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon growth to appropriate targets. Although strategies that increase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity have been employed to “fuel” RGC axon regeneration, they are not as effective at “steering” regeneration. Based on compelling evidence that electric field (EF) application does both, we investigated whether EFs—in conjunction with mTOR activation—direct more target-specific RGC axon regeneration than with either treatment alone in an optic nerve crush model.

Methods : Adult male Long-Evans rats underwent intravitreal injection with AAV2-rRHEB to increase mTOR activity. Two weeks later, the animals underwent optic nerve crush followed by intra-orbital and intracranial electrode implantation. One week later, biphasic waveforms were applied for 5 hours daily for 30 days. One week before euthanasia, the animals were injected intravitreally with cholera toxin B for anterograde labeling of regenerated axons. Regenerative responses were assessed via histologic, electrophysiologic, behavioral, and pupillary light reflex testing.

Results : Compared to untreated animals (N=5), we observed 33-fold more axon regeneration at 1000 um past the crush site after EF+mTOR treatment (N=2) vs 26-fold with EF (N=5, p=0.03) and 4-fold with mTOR (N=3, p=0.02) (Fig.1; Fig. 2). Local field potential recordings demonstrated greatest partial recovery of visual function in the superior colliculus of EF+mTOR animals with 22.6% of sites responding (N=2), followed by 15.9% in EF (N=6), 1.1% in mTOR (N=3), and 1.3% in untreated animals (N=5) (EF vs untreated, p ≤ 0.001). Each animal tested for pupillary light reflex in the EF+mTOR (N=6) and EF (N=10) groups consistently demonstrated pupillary constriction whereas only 33.3% in the untreated (N=6) and mTOR (N=3) groups did.

Conclusions : The results suggest that treatment with EF exerts synergistic effects with mTOR in promoting RGC survival and directing target-specific long distance axon growth, with consequent partial recovery of visual function in rats.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

Figure 1. Varying levels of regenerated RGC axons (white) observed after different treatments, with EF+mTOR demonstrating greatest efficacy. Asterisk denotes crush site and scale bar is 250um.

Figure 1. Varying levels of regenerated RGC axons (white) observed after different treatments, with EF+mTOR demonstrating greatest efficacy. Asterisk denotes crush site and scale bar is 250um.

 

Figure 2. Long distance axon regeneration seen in the optic chiasm (arrow) after treatment with EF+mTOR.

Figure 2. Long distance axon regeneration seen in the optic chiasm (arrow) after treatment with EF+mTOR.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×