Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 64, Issue 8
June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2023
Development of stimulus paradigms and models for clinical translation of optoretinography
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Denise Valente
    Dept. of Physics, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
    Dept. of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, UC Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California, United States
  • Kari V Vienola
    Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turun Yliopistoy, Finland
    Dept. of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, UC Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California, United States
  • Robert J Zawadzki
    Dept. of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, UC Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California, United States
    EyePod Imaging Lab, Dept. of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • Ravi Sankar Jonnal
    Dept. of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, UC Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Denise Valente None; Kari Vienola None; Robert Zawadzki US7791734B2, Code P (Patent); Ravi Jonnal US7364296B2, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI grants R01EY031098, R01EY026556, and R01EY033532, CNpQ grants
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, 1358. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Denise Valente, Kari V Vienola, Robert J Zawadzki, Ravi Sankar Jonnal; Development of stimulus paradigms and models for clinical translation of optoretinography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(8):1358.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Optoretinography (ORG) is a tool for noninvasive functional assessment of retinal neurons. Development of stimuli and quantification of responses are critical first steps toward employing the ORG as a functional biomarker. Here we show ORG measurements from a custom adaptive optics full-field OCT system [Valente et al., 2020, BOE] using several stimulus patterns and describe a model for quantifying them.

Methods : The system consists of a tunable light source that illuminates an extended region of the retina. Light reflected from the retina is corrected using a deformable mirror and wavefront sensor, and then interfered with light from a reference mirror. The x-y-λ spatio-spectral cube is converted by DFT into a 3D image of the retina, with amplitude and phase of light scattered from the corresponding tissue. Two volunteers were imaged. Various stimulus patterns were used, including multiple flashes separated by controllable delays, background illumination, and step-function illumination.

Results : Cone OS phase exhibits dose-dependent contraction and elongation (1A), as previously reported. In some cases, responses to multiple flashes appeared to be linear combinations of single flash responses (1A, brown). These fit a mathematical model based on coupled overdamped oscillators (1A,B). Model parameters correlated with stimulus energy (1C-F). The model predicts some multiple-flash responses, confirming apparent linearity. To a series of 10 flashes given at 20 Hz, OS contractions diminish, as when flashes are presented against adapting backgrounds. Responses to step-function stimuli bore similarity to integrations of single-flash responses.

Conclusions : A model was proposed that appears to fit the biphasic ORG response in cones. Parameters of this model exhibit dose-dependence and may offer distinct utility in quantifying the effects of experimental variables, including dark and light adaptation, circadian factors, or the presence of retinal disease.

Acknowledgements: NEI grants R01EY031098, R01EY026556, and R01EY033532, CNpQ grants.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 2023.

 

(A) Light-evoked changes in OS length. The brown trace shows responses to two 4% bleaching flashes, 0.3 s apart. (B) Model of light-evoked contraction and elongation; H(t) is the Heaviside step function. (C-F) Behavior of model parameters over the same range of bleaching energies in two subjects (x,o). 𝜏2 and 𝜏4 did not appear to correlate with energy.

(A) Light-evoked changes in OS length. The brown trace shows responses to two 4% bleaching flashes, 0.3 s apart. (B) Model of light-evoked contraction and elongation; H(t) is the Heaviside step function. (C-F) Behavior of model parameters over the same range of bleaching energies in two subjects (x,o). 𝜏2 and 𝜏4 did not appear to correlate with energy.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×