June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   June 2023
Comparison of Machine-Learning and Automatic Thresholding to Manual Segmentation of Retinal Vessels from Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography in Healthy Subjects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David Le
    Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Ramiro Maldonado
    Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   David Le, None; Ramiro Maldonado, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, PB0036. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David Le, Ramiro Maldonado; Comparison of Machine-Learning and Automatic Thresholding to Manual Segmentation of Retinal Vessels from Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography in Healthy Subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(9):PB0036.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : OCT-Angiography (OCTA) is an imaging modality that produces high-quality images of the retinal vasculature; however, vessel density (VD) measurements vary depending on the method used. To address this, we obtained manual segmentation of OCTA scans and compared to automatic thresholding and an artificial-intelligence machine-learning classifier.

Methods : IRB approved study to analyze OCTA images, 20 healthy subjects were enrolled. One eye per subject was included. 3x3mm scans of the superficial retinal capillary plexus were obtained by swept-source OCTA. Vessel segmentation maps were obtained by 3 methods: manual tracing by three graders utilizing Photoshop; automatic thresholding in FIJI (Global and Local Mean radius: 32, 64, 128, 256; and Local Phansalkar radius: 32, 64, 128, 256); and machine-learning (Weka Segmentation - FIJI). VD was calculated using the particle counter function within FIJI. Statistical analyses performed in JMP.
To simplify comparisons across the three methods; we averaged the VD data of the 2 manual graders with the highest correlation and selected the 2 automatic thresholding settings with the most agreement in their algorithms: Global Mean and Phansalkar radius 32.

Results : Patients: 17 females; 15 Caucasian, 1 African-American, 2 Hispanic, 1 Asian, and 1 “Other.” Mean age of 51 years +/- 17. OCTA of 14 right and 6 left eyes.
Mean VD by the three manual graders was 54.0 +/- 2.7, 45.8 +/- 6.3, and 54.2 +/- 5.7, respectively (p<0.0001) although Graders 1 and 3, p=0.9211.
VD of the 5 Mean algorithms were significantly different (p= 0.0003); while the 4 Phansalkar settings were not (p= 0.1789).
When comparing auto-thresholding, manual tracing, and machine-learning in the Global Mean algorithm, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.068 (fourth-class); while in the Phansalkar radius 32 algorithm had an ICC of 0.0776 (fourth-class). In paired T-tests, manual grading was found to be significantly different from all alternative methods of segmentation (p<0.0001).

Conclusions : Although agreement can be found within one modality, there are large discrepancies in the VD achieved when comparing different methodologies. Relative to manual tracing, our machine-learning classifier produced higher VD measures; conversely automatic thresholding produced lower VD readings.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference, held in New Orleans, LA, April 21-22, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×