June 2023
Volume 64, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   June 2023
Which comes first: structural or functional glaucoma progression?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yapei Zhang
    Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul
    Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Center of Excellence in Glaucoma, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Edem Tsikata
    Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Michele Zemplenyi
    Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Hang Lee
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Milica A. Margeta
    Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Courtney L. Ondeck
    Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Anne L. Coleman
    Ophthalmology, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Fei Yu
    Ophthalmology, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
    University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Johannes F. de Boer
    Physics and Astronomy, Vrijie Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Ophthalmology, Vrijie Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Teresa C. Chen
    Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yapei Zhang, None; Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul, None; Edem Tsikata, None; Michele Zemplenyi, None; Hang Lee, None; Milica Margeta, None; Courtney Ondeck, None; Anne Coleman, None; Fei Yu, None; Johannes de Boer, Heidelberg Engineering (P), NIDEK Inc. (P), Ninepoint Medical (P), Terumo Corporation (P); Teresa Chen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2023, Vol.64, PB0025. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yapei Zhang, Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul, Edem Tsikata, Michele Zemplenyi, Hang Lee, Milica A. Margeta, Courtney L. Ondeck, Anne L. Coleman, Fei Yu, Johannes F. de Boer, Teresa C. Chen; Which comes first: structural or functional glaucoma progression?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023;64(9):PB0025.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To determine the frequency by which glaucoma progression is first detected by structural change versus functional change.

Methods : A prospective longitudinal cohort study of open angle glaucoma patients was conducted. To be included in the study, patients required at least 4 study visits, which included yearly dilated eye exams, disc photography (DP), Humphrey visual field 24-2 testing (HVF), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness scans, and high-density optic nerve volume SD-OCT scans (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), all performed on the same day. From high-density optic nerve volume scans, custom-built software calculated the minimum distance band (MDB) thickness, a three-dimensional (3D) neuroretinal rim parameter. Event-based analysis was used to classify patients as glaucoma progressors or non-glaucoma progressors. Progression by DP and HVF occurred when 3 masked glaucoma specialists unanimously concurred. Progression by RNFL and MDB thickness occurred if there was change greater than test-retest variability. Structural change occurred if there was glaucoma progression by DP, RNFL thickness, or MDB thickness. Functional change occurred if there was progression by HVF testing. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and unpaired 2-tailed t-tests were used for continuous variables.

Results : One hundred twenty-four patients were followed for an average of 66.9 ± 16.4 months. Of the 124 eyes, 97 eyes were classified as glaucoma progressors. Of these, 56 (57.7%) progressed first by structural change, 27 (27.8%) progressed first by functional change, and 14 (14.4%) progressed by simultaneous structural and functional changes. The functional change cohort consisted of eyes with more advanced glaucoma at baseline compared to the structural change cohort, and this was true when glaucoma staging was assessed by both Hodapp–Anderson–Parrish criteria (22.2% versus 12.5% severe glaucoma, p=.006) and by HVF mean deviation (-8.3± 6.3 dB versus -5.6 ± 5.7 dB, p<.05).

Conclusions : Classic teaching suggests that glaucomatous structural progression precedes functional progression. In contrast, nearly one third of glaucoma progressors exhibited functional change before structural change, and functional change occurred first in patients with more advanced glaucoma or worse baseline mean deviation.

This abstract was presented at the 2023 ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference, held in New Orleans, LA, April 21-22, 2023.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×