After observing the activation of necroptosis following IR, we proceeded to examine the impact of inhibiting necroptosis on IR-induced neuronal injury. RIPK3 holds a crucial position in the downstream signaling cascade of necroptosis and is capable of triggering necroptosis in a RIPK1-independent manner.
6 Hence, RIPK3 inhibitors have been discovered to provide protection against a wider range of pro-necrotic stimuli as compared to RIPK1 inhibitors.
44,45 The selective targeting of RIPK3 has garnered attention to develop inhibitors for various pathological conditions.
17 In this study, we used GSK840, a selective small-molecule RIPK3 inhibitor that conjugates to the RIPK3 kinase domain and represses kinase activity in a highly specific manner.
17 GSK840, initially identified by Mandal et al.
17 in 2014, has primarily been applied in vitro, and its in vivo efficacy is not fully elucidated. First, we carefully considered the timing of GSK840 administration and its potential impact on efficacy. It is noteworthy that both pre- and post-insult administration of small-molecule necroptosis inhibitor have been investigated in studies, each with its own considerations and advantages.
21,46,47 However, post-insult administration more closely aligns with the clinical practice of intervening after injury occurs. Therefore we chose to administer GSK840 immediately after IR insult to mimic a clinically relevant scenario. Our results, in line with previous research,
43 showed that the expression levels of necroptotic proteins, including RIPK3 and p-RIPK3, increase significantly after IR and peak around 12 hours post-insult, with subsequent gradual reduction. This suggests the existence of a potential therapeutic window during which GSK840 could effectively inhibit necroptosis, thus exerting its neuroprotective effects. However, the exact duration of this time window requires further investigation. Beyond the timing of administration, we also considered the delivery method and concentration of GSK840. Wen et al.
22 reported the potential teratogenic effects of high concentrations of GSK840 in zebrafish larvae, indicating possible dose-dependent toxicity when administered in vivo. Consequently, we chose intravitreal injection as the delivery route to minimize potential systemic effects. Furthermore, we designed a concentration gradient for intravitreal administration based on the study by He et al.
21 Our results revealed an intriguing pattern: RGC counts did not significantly increase in the 0.5 mM group compared to the IR group. However, a significant increase in RGC survival was observed when the concentration was elevated to 1 mM. Intriguingly, further escalation to 5 mM did not yield a significant difference in RGC counts compared to the IR group. This prompted us to investigate potential retinal toxicity at the 5 mM. We conducted an additional experiment by injecting of 2 µL of 5 mM GSK840 or control vehicle into the vitreous of wild-type mice. The results revealed a significant reduction in RGC counts in mice injected with 5 mM GSK840 compared to those receiving the control vehicle (
Supplementary Fig. S2). This observation aligns with the findings of Wen et al.
22 and suggests that 5 mM GSK840 may indeed possess some retinal toxicity. Consequently, we selected the concentration of 1 mM for subsequent experiments. In addition to quantification of RGC survival, our HE and SD-OCT analyses further revealed that GSK840 treatment mitigated the reduction in NFL/GCL and GCC thickness caused by IR. In line with morphological results, our functional results showed GSK840 alleviated IR-induced reduction in PhNR amplitude, which reflects the function of RGCs.
37 In addition to its RGC rescuing effect, GSK840 treatment also prevented the loss of amacrine cells, as well as the reduction in INL thickness and OPs amplitude. Interestingly, GSK840 alleviated the reductions in b-wave amplitudes, which suggests damage to bipolar cells.
36 Nevertheless, no noteworthy difference in the population of PKC-α
+ bipolar cells was observed among four groups, which is consistent with previous findings.
48,49 There is a possibility that bipolar cells continue to express protein kinase c after IR, but their functions are damaged, such as axonal neurotransmission.
50 In fact, we found IR induced a decrease in axonal length of bipolar cells, which was ameliorated by GSK840 treatment. Collectively, these findings support the neuroprotective potential of GSK840 in the context of retinal IR and highlight the critical considerations in the timing, method, and concentration of GSK840 administration for optimal therapeutic outcomes.