A limitation of this study is the reliance on cell morphology for identification of immune cells, which is, however, a widely used approach in vivo,
13,19,44–46 rather than full cell characterization, which is possible only in vitro. Two recent publications using a combination of flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in murine models and in human donor corneas, characterized cell type in vitro and used human time-lapse IVCM to explore cell behavior in vivo.
30,47 Cells seen in IVCM are likely to be a combination of T cell and dendritic cell populations,
30,47 where small, mobile immune cells lacking visible dendrites are believed to be T cells, whereas larger cells with evident dendrites are dendritic cells.
30 We believe these observations do not impact the findings of the current study. The morphology grading system used in the current study
18 reports size and morphological characteristics of cells at least 10 µm in cell body diameter and separately considers cells lacking discernible dendrites. The type of dendrites is then reported only for those cells where dendrites are visible, which allows analysis of morphologically distinct immune cell populations. A recent animal study investigated the cells involved in subclinical inflammation in the cornea during contact lens wear.
48 This study revealed that the cells involved in this process were dendritic cells, and some of the cells found at the periphery were T cells.
48 T cells are considered to be 10 to 20 µm in size,
49,50 and, consequently, the EIC defined in the small cells identified in the current study could be a combination of T cells and dendritic cells, whereas the medium or large cells are representative of dendritic cells. The current study does not classify immune cells as mature or immature
46,51 and instead characterizes “antigen-capture capacity” and “migratory capacity” based on morphology, which we believe to reflect the functional ability in vivo.