The procedures for trabeculectomy, specimen preparation, and subsequent staining have been described previously.
14,25 Briefly, trabeculectomy-excised tissues were fixed overnight in a mixture of 2.5% or 5% formalin and 1% glutaraldehyde, and then they were divided into three to five blocks. All divided specimens were embedded in paraffin and cut into sections with a thickness of 3 µm. These paraffin sections underwent hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemical staining with anti-TBM antibodies (clone 1009; Agilent Technologies Japan, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), an established marker for SCE and collector channel endothelial cells.
14,25,27 The stained sections were then photographed and digitally imaged using an optical microscope system (OLYMPUS BX53, Tokyo, Japan; objective lens ×40, 2448 × 1920 pixels, TIFF format). On the obtained photographs, SC morphology parameters were estimated using ImageJ software (version 1.52a; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) on a Windows 10 computer. To determine the extent of SC, the anterior and posterior edges were identified in HE-stained images (
Fig. 1A, arrows). Four primary parameters were measured on the TBM-stained images depending on the appearance of TBM staining positivity and openings of SC lumen (i.e., presence or absence of SC lumen) (
Fig. 1B).
28 The four primary parameters consisted of the lengths of TBM-positive and opened (POSC, indicated by the red double arrow) or closed (PCSC, the black double arrow) SC, as well as the lengths of TBM-negative and opened (NOSC, the green double arrow) or closed (NCSC, the blue double arow) SC (
Figs. 1B,
2A;
Table 1). After obtaining these parameters, additional parameters, including the total SC length (TSC, the length between arrows in
Figs. 1,
2), TBM positive/negative SC lengths (PSC/NSC), and opened/closed SC lengths (OSC, CSC), were calculated. Definitions of these parameters are listed in
Table 1. Owing to the nature of the parameter definitions, alterations in any given parameter are inherently connected to changes in the corresponding other parameters. All the images were evaluated independently by two examiners (i.e., AT and TH), and the four primary parameters were determined by consensus between the examiners. Out of the sections analyzed, 26 eyes in the POAG group and 5 eyes in the EXG group were excluded from the study due to tissue destruction during excision of the TM.