Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Effectiveness, safety, and practicality of robotic systems in eye surgery: A systematic review
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Arun James Thirunavukarasu
    Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Monica L. Hu
    Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • William P. Foster
    Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Kanmin Xue
    Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Jasmina Cehajic Kapetanovic
    Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Robert E MacLaren
    Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Arun Thirunavukarasu None; Monica Hu None; William Foster None; Kanmin Xue None; Jasmina Cehajic Kapetanovic None; Robert MacLaren None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 888. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Monica L. Hu, William P. Foster, Kanmin Xue, Jasmina Cehajic Kapetanovic, Robert E MacLaren; Effectiveness, safety, and practicality of robotic systems in eye surgery: A systematic review. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):888.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Uptake of robotic systems for ocular surgery is impeded by the challenges of a rotationally mobile field, rapid surgery in awake patients, and little tolerance for aberrant motion. However, as surgical outcomes and innovation are becoming limited by human physiology, robotic assistance offers a means by which the therapeutic repertoire of ophthalmologists may be expanded. This systematic review aimed to identify how robotic systems have been applied in eye surgery, and to appraise their effectiveness, practicality, and safety.

Methods : The Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched with records fulfilling the following criteria included: English language; primary research article; human patients; eye surgery; robot-assisted or robot-mediated surgery. Joanna Briggs Institute Tools for Critical Appraisal were used for quality assessment. Data extraction captured study design, location, surgical procedures, and outcome measures of clinical effectiveness, safety, and practicality for surgeons. The study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023449793).

Results : 12 studies were identified: three randomised-control trials (RCTs), seven case series, and two case reports. Robotic systems have been used to assist with a variety of tasks in corneal, orbital, and vitreoretinal surgery. All RCTs trialled the Preceyes BV system. RCT results indicated no significant differences in clinical outcomes or adverse events between patients undergoing robot-assisted and conventional surgery but were underpowered to appraise non-inferiority or superiority (Nmax = 15). Robotic assistance was associated with longer duration of surgery in 2/3 RCTs (p < 0.05). One study reported lesser movement distance of robot-assisted instruments, indicating greater efficiency. Surveyed surgeons were positive regarding ergonomics and intuitiveness. Preceyes has received CE marking approval to assist trained vitreoretinal surgeons in theatre.

Conclusions : Robotic systems have safely assisted with ophthalmic surgery in proof-of-concept studies, including some that extend human capability such as retinal vessel cannulation. However, robot-assistance increases procedure duration. Further technological refinements are necessary to design interventions to improve clinical outcomes and justify adoption of robotic systems in ophthalmology.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

 

Forest plot depicting longer duration of robot-assisted surgery.

Forest plot depicting longer duration of robot-assisted surgery.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×