Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparing the pupillary light response to white, red, and blue stimuli with cerebrovascular reactivity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sierra Sparks
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Genevieve Hayes
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Joana Pinto
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Joel Martin
    Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
  • Manuel Spitschan
    TUM School of Medicine and Health, Chronobiology and Health, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany
    Translational Sensory and Circadian Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
  • Daniel P. Bulte
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sierra Sparks None; Genevieve Hayes None; Joana Pinto None; Joel Martin None; Manuel Spitschan None; Daniel Bulte None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council UK Grant EP/S021507/1
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2465. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sierra Sparks, Genevieve Hayes, Joana Pinto, Joel Martin, Manuel Spitschan, Daniel P. Bulte; Comparing the pupillary light response to white, red, and blue stimuli with cerebrovascular reactivity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2465.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Impaired pupillary light response (PLR) and decreased cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) have been linked with neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease. Here, we compare the PLR in response to different light stimuli with CVR measurements retrieved with transcranial doppler ultrasound (TCD), in order to determine if there is a relationship between CVR and PLR in healthy subjects.

Methods : 11 healthy subjects (sex: 5F; mean age=33±9 years) were studied. PLR data were acquired with PyPlr, an open-source system of hardware and software developed in-house (Martin et al., 2021). All subjects underwent a 2-minute dark adaptation before completing two PLR protocols. The first protocol was a 1 s (50 µW) white flash, with a 90 s interstimulus interval (ISI), to assess the PLR. The second was a 1 s blue flash (470 nm peak) followed by a 90 s ISI, then a 1 s red flash (659 nm peak, intensity matched to blue stimulus) followed by a 90 s ISI, to assess the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) at maximal and minimal melanopsin sensitivity. Three trials were administered for each protocol. CVR measurements were retrieved from blood flow changes in the middle cerebral artery, obtained with transcranial Doppler ultrasound during a gas challenge (2 minutes of medical air, followed by 3 minutes of 5% CO2). All measurements were taken between 9:00 and 16:00.

Results : Although there were no statistically significant relationships between the PLR or PIPR and CVR, constriction velocity (p=0.09) and maximum constriction velocity (p=0.07) in response to white light showed positive trends with CVR. Additionally, the difference in percent change from baseline 6 s after light offset (6 s PIPR) between the red and blue light showed a weak negative trend with CVR (p=0.17).

Conclusions : This is the first work investigating the relationship between the PLR, PIPR, and CVR in healthy subjects. No statistically significant relationships were identified in the group between the PLR or PIPR and CVR, although some showed trends approaching significance. More research should be conducted in a larger, more diverse subject group to investigate the impact of other variables such as demographics or genetics, and the relationship between the PLR, PIPR, and CVR.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Constriction velocity and maximum constriction velocity vs. CVR

Constriction velocity and maximum constriction velocity vs. CVR

 

Difference in percent change from baseline, in the 6 s PIPR of red and blue light, vs. CVR

Difference in percent change from baseline, in the 6 s PIPR of red and blue light, vs. CVR

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×