Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Method for Quantitative Evaluation of Posterior Vitreous Adhesion in Ex Vivo Porcine Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tara Suresh
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Lauren Ong
    California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, California, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Christopher Marotta
    Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States
  • Dan Schwartz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Frank Brodie
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Tara Suresh None; Lauren Ong None; Christopher Marotta None; Dan Schwartz RxSight, Inc. (RXST), Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Frank Brodie Genentech, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bausch and Lomb, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Alimera Sciences, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), RxSight, Code I (Personal Financial Interest)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 6630. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tara Suresh, Lauren Ong, Christopher Marotta, Dan Schwartz, Frank Brodie; Method for Quantitative Evaluation of Posterior Vitreous Adhesion in Ex Vivo Porcine Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):6630.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Modulation of posterior vitreous attachment is an area of significant interest as posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is a critical first step in vitreoretinal surgery but can be very challenging, especially in young or diabetic patients. A necessary step in developing new therapies for vitreous modulation is an effective benchtop model. No literature to date identifies a quantifiable assessment of posterior vitreous adhesion that is also clinically applicable. We mimicked surgical methods to induce vitreous detachment in clinical practice, developing a method valuable in translation to clinical research.

Methods : Basic Saline Solution (BSS) for negative control or Plasmin of different concentrations (2, 3, or 5U) was injected into post-mortem porcine eyes. Plasmin can pharmacologically induce PVDs. Eyes were placed in 37°C water bath for 1 hour. Posterior vitreous adhesion was assessed by utilizing the Alcon Constellation system and 23G Vitrectomy pack to quantify, through the minimum vacuum required to induce a PVD, ease of detachment around the optic disc and in the periphery. Independently, standard milligram weights were lifted using the same 23G vitrector.

Results : Our data from the standard weights shows that the vitrector vacuum directly relates to the maximum possible lifted mass with an R2 value of 0.99. The average minimum vacuum necessary to induce a PVD was 395± 28 mmHg for 0U of plasmin, 385± 58 mmHg for 2U of plasmin, 265± 53 mmHg for 3U of plasmin, and 145± 28 mmHg for 5U of plasmin. We demonstrated a dose-dependent response curve with increasing amounts of plasmin leading to a lower minimum vacuum necessary to induce a PVD.

Conclusions : As expected, there was a dose-dependent response curve demonstrating a relationship between increasing plasmin and decreasing posterior vitreous adhesion. The force exerted by the vacuum was verified independently using objects of known mass. We believe that this model offers significant benefits over prior work as it minimizes confounding manipulations and offers a quantitative assessment that is translatable to the clinic.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Fig 1- Average Vitrector Vacuum versus Maximum Mass lifted by aspiration

Fig 1- Average Vitrector Vacuum versus Maximum Mass lifted by aspiration

 

Fig 2- Effect of plasmin concentration injected on the average minimum vacuum needed to induce a PVD

Fig 2- Effect of plasmin concentration injected on the average minimum vacuum needed to induce a PVD

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×