Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
The Ebbinghaus illusion in amblyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Changwu Tan
    Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Xi Wang
    Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Tong Liu
    Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Longqian Liu
    Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Alexandre Reynaud
    McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    BRaIN program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Changwu Tan None; Xi Wang None; Tong Liu None; Longqian Liu None; Alexandre Reynaud None
  • Footnotes
    Support  the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 82201233), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023NSFSC1669)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5206. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Changwu Tan, Xi Wang, Tong Liu, Longqian Liu, Alexandre Reynaud; The Ebbinghaus illusion in amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5206.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We need to perceive the size of objects accurately to interact with the real world. However, the perceived size of an object could be biased by its surroundings. For example, in the Ebbinghaus illusion, the perceived size of a central target depends on the size of the surrounding inducers. The strength of this illusion correlates with the cortical magnification in human primary visual cortex (V1). Amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental disorder, is associated with abnormal cortical structure. In the current study, we measured the magnitude of Ebbinghaus illusion in control and amblyopic populations to investigate (1) whether the patients with amblyopia have normal object size perception, and (2) how their perception is affected by abnormal interocular interactions.

Methods : Sixteen adult amblyopes and 16 controls participated in the experiment. There were two inducer sizes of the Ebbinghaus stimuli: small and large (Fig.1A). We measured the Ebbinghaus magnitude under binocular Bi, monocular MF and MA, and dichoptic DTF, DTA, DTPF, and DTPA viewing conditions (Fig.1B) using a pedestal task. The point of subjective equality (PSE) of the psychophysical function of the perceived size relative to the pedestal defined the magnitude of the illusion.

Results : First, we compared the difference of the Ebbinghaus magnitude between the amblyopic and control group across the 7 viewing conditions. In the small inducers condition, we found a significant main effect of group (F1,30=5.42, P=0.027). The post hoc analysis showed that amblyopes had larger illusion magnitudes in MA (P<0.001) and DTA (P=0.016) conditions when compared to controls. For large inducers, the effect of group (F1,30=7.08, P=0.012) was also significant. But the illusion magnitude was significantly smaller for amblyopes in the MA, DTPF and DTPA conditions (P≤0.046). Within groups, we found that both the amblyopic and control group showed a decreased illusion magnitude in the dichoptic DTPF and DTPA conditions compared to the monocular viewing (P≤0.009).

Conclusions : Our results showed that the patients with amblyopia exhibited a larger Ebbinghaus illusion magnitude with small inducers, but a smaller magnitude with large inducers, with either the amblyopic eye or dichoptic viewings. This impaired perception may be due to the abnormal cortical structure and function in the amblyopic brain, especially in V1.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Fig.1 Illustration of the experimental stimuli.

Fig.1 Illustration of the experimental stimuli.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×