Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Safety and Feasibility of Performing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Periorbital Malignancies at Standalone Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alexander Dennis
    University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Delaram Mirzania
    University of Michigan Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Zhenyang Zhao
    University of Michigan Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Scott Mclean
    Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Christine Nelson
    University of Michigan Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alexander Dennis None; Delaram Mirzania None; Zhenyang Zhao None; Scott Mclean None; Christine Nelson None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4103. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alexander Dennis, Delaram Mirzania, Zhenyang Zhao, Scott Mclean, Christine Nelson; Safety and Feasibility of Performing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Periorbital Malignancies at Standalone Ambulatory Surgical Centers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4103.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a critical step in the stratification and treatment of facial and periorbital malignancies. Though this procedure has been shown to be safe when performed in a hospital setting, there is little data on the safety and efficacy of SLNB performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). We performed a retrospective, clinical observational study to determine the feasibility of performing SLNBs in an ambulatory setting.

Methods : We performed a retrospective review of 79 consecutive SLNB procedures performed at an academic tertiary referral hospital (46 cases) and ASCs (33 cases) associated with our institution between September 2014 and November 2022. Using two-sampled T tests and stepwise multivariate logistic regression, we compared demographic and clinical characteristics, operative wait time, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and rates of complication between procedures performed in the university hospital versus ambulatory settings.

Results : Compared to patients who underwent SLNB in a hospital setting, patients at ASCs were younger (age 62 vs. 73, p < 0.001) and had better overall health as measured by the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ classification score (2.18 vs. 2.71, p < 0.001). On average, SLNB procedures performed at ASCs had significantly less EBL than those performed in the university hospital (11.48 mL vs 45.53 mL, P = 0.03), and were performed with significantly shorter operative time (73 vs 113 minutes, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in operative wait times. There were no complications associated with SLNB procedures performed in at ASCs.

Conclusions : With no complications, less blood loss, and shorter operative times compared to SLNB performed in a hospital setting, SLNB procedures were shown to be safe and effective when performed at ambulatory surgical centers associated with our institution.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×