Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Machine Learning-Assisted Identification of Potential Metabolite Biomarkers for Glaucoma Diagnosis through Serum Metabolomic Analysis – A Preliminary Finding
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Zaw-Myo Win
    Centre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Xuelei Liu
    Centre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Lei Zhou
    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Centre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Scott Hopkins
    University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
    Centre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Allen M Y Cheong
    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Centre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Zaw-Myo Win None; Xuelei Liu None; Lei Zhou None; Scott Hopkins None; Allen Cheong None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3550. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zaw-Myo Win, Xuelei Liu, Lei Zhou, Scott Hopkins, Allen M Y Cheong; Machine Learning-Assisted Identification of Potential Metabolite Biomarkers for Glaucoma Diagnosis through Serum Metabolomic Analysis – A Preliminary Finding. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3550.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Glaucoma is a leading cause of permanent blindness worldwide. Identifying biomarkers is crucial for the early detection and monitoring of disease progression. Herein, we utilized machine learning algorithms to develop and validate potential metabolite biomarkers for diagnosing glaucoma from metabolomic data.

Methods : A total of seven glaucoma individuals and nine age-matched healthy controls were recruited. For enhanced metabolite analysis, we utilized the Thermo Scientific Orbitrap IQ-X Mass Spectrometer on frozen serum samples and employed two chromatographic separation modes (Amide column and T3 column). We utilized three tree-based machine learning models on metabolomic data to identify metabolic alterations and potential glaucoma biomarkers.

Results : A total of 3192 metabolite features were detected using Amide-positive(Amide-Pos), Amide-negative(Amide-Neg), T3-positive(T3-Pos), and T3-negative(T3-Neg) analytical modes. Among them, a total of 651 compounds were identified with higher confidence subject to biological interpretation. The Random Forest model achieved the highest accuracy of 0.87 among the three models and exhibited superior performance (p-value = 0.019). After the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, N, N'-Dicyclohexylurea was found to be the most significant feature for the classification of glaucoma patients.

Conclusions : We successfully utilized machine learning and advanced spectrometry to identify potential biomarkers for glaucoma diagnosis. Notably, N, N'-Dicyclohexylurea emerged as a significant feature in distinguishing glaucoma patients from healthy controls. Scientific studies have established a connection between N, N'-Dicyclohexylurea and both ocular surface disease and systemic blood pressure. However, further investigation is required to fully understand the potential relationship between N, N'-Dicyclohexylurea, and glaucoma. Although further studies with larger sample sizes are needed, this approach allowed us to find a potential metabolite biomarker that could predict the early stage of glaucoma.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure (A) Workflow and metabolite identification through different acquisition modes. (B) Histogram of the detected compound with different modes. (C) Histogram of the identified compound with different modes. (D) Venn diagram of compound distribution in different modes.

Figure (A) Workflow and metabolite identification through different acquisition modes. (B) Histogram of the detected compound with different modes. (C) Histogram of the identified compound with different modes. (D) Venn diagram of compound distribution in different modes.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×